From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751515AbaIRFBi (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:01:38 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:48187 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751060AbaIRFBg (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:01:36 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1410991612.4290.10.camel@joe-AO725> References: <1410990447-3210-1-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <1410990447-3210-2-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <1410991612.4290.10.camel@joe-AO725> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] eeepc-laptop: clean up coding style From: Frans Klaver Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:01:25 +0200 To: Joe Perches CC: Darren Hart , Corentin Chary , Rafael Wysocki , Greg Kroah-Hartman , acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <642509cf-05f2-47f4-be2e-a3cfb9a93a04@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18 September 2014 00:06:52 CEST, Joe Perches wrote: >On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 23:47 +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: >> Correct indentation and brace usage to comply with >> Documentation/CodingStyle. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 8 +++++--- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c >b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c >> index 3095d38..653999e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c >> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int eeepc_led_init(struct eeepc_laptop >*eeepc) >> eeepc->tpd_led.name = "eeepc::touchpad"; >> eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_set = tpd_led_set; >> if (get_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_TPD) >= 0) /* if method is available */ >> - eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_get = tpd_led_get; >> + eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_get = tpd_led_get; >> eeepc->tpd_led.max_brightness = 1; >> >> rv = led_classdev_register(&eeepc->platform_device->dev, >> @@ -692,8 +692,9 @@ static int eeepc_register_rfkill_notifier(struct >eeepc_laptop *eeepc, >> * changed during setup. >> */ >> eeepc_rfkill_hotplug(eeepc, handle); >> - } else >> + } else { >> return -ENODEV; >> + } >> >> return 0; >> } > >This sort of code: > > if (foo) { > [ do_something ] > } else > return -ERRVAL; > >is generally better rewritten as: > > if (!foo) > return -ERRVAL; > > [ do_something ] > >This gives immediacy to the error handler and >as well reduces unnecessary indentation. I fully agree. Darren, do you still take this in one patch? Frans