From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D4B40D57D; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781747136; cv=none; b=mPuatzUqixk4hOjNdEjoMpmaRgtQhWD1fiDyUTd9wziFcsl+nF+HjqV1C+8hFN0zZUjXdRFTbqtb7ZHCKWq4mKYejJXzFhDyb9V7P2goHcF+DrNfiazkbGFGOxJuF6b+MpdQ3W6g6umPjZLltnXaJt9SuRA3jzChYFzx8Ue+DjU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781747136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ddQ+SMN/+Lp7HFPmuIVAxMq7wm4oLOOuYVK6wbQbSU0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=IcziNSsutIABUt8X6tFXHMcdgc6xW0MtwnXV3vG6J0c8rZMNyTEC+Dms0k3VWUDD0zU2fN57bRvsV0n6TmYyXs4Tg7ftVR3td5bQBlus/j9BjPY9lxehX3NL7JO04ml/NmWHmTZJ8elalwTcM35Slms15uoUDLdYLrP/Yj82xDQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=mKZIAMgr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=mKZIAMgr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="mKZIAMgr"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="mKZIAMgr" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=elgYJ9FctEuOCR5N0/Evesj9qTtWETUXJRRIi/jFI38=; b=mKZIAMgrv0yhhqfotPRGtcu6nLs4Chv0duVXxR76TfyQ3YmTy1nupn328cT3+Yi8uyhE+9n3j uc7hX8yW3e8zJNd2aoWbAUFQRgY3AFqjEchvsWtvpFlpDHyb9xAegYA4dU42PHQBl0b7E74Ye3c bNyffaauQdereWE6+Bi3IAM= Received: from canpmsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [172.19.92.148]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4ggk7D40D2z1BG77; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:44:56 +0800 (CST) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=elgYJ9FctEuOCR5N0/Evesj9qTtWETUXJRRIi/jFI38=; b=mKZIAMgrv0yhhqfotPRGtcu6nLs4Chv0duVXxR76TfyQ3YmTy1nupn328cT3+Yi8uyhE+9n3j uc7hX8yW3e8zJNd2aoWbAUFQRgY3AFqjEchvsWtvpFlpDHyb9xAegYA4dU42PHQBl0b7E74Ye3c bNyffaauQdereWE6+Bi3IAM= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.127]) by canpmsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4ggjyS3WKvzKmMH; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:37:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DADF3402AB; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:45:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:45:17 +0800 Message-ID: <6437c0e3-d5c5-44b1-9157-b30bae2a6335@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:45:17 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 00/10] arm64/riscv: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation To: Mike Rapoport CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20260608073459.3119290-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) On 6/18/2026 2:48 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi Jinjie, > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >> The crash memory allocation, and the exclude of crashk_res, crashk_low_res >> and crashk_cma memory are almost identical across different architectures, >> This patch set handle them in crash core in a general way, which eliminate >> a lot of duplication code. >> >> And add support for crashkernel CMA reservation for arm64 and riscv. >> >> This patch set is rebased on v7.1-rc1. > > Please rebase this set on v7.2-rc1 once that's out. > > I'm going to queue it in the liveupdate tree then to expose to the wider > testing. > > Meanwhile it would be great to chase riscv and x86 maintainers for acks :) Thanks! That sounds great. I will rebase this patch set on v7.2-rc1 as soon as it is out and send v17. In the meantime, I will CC and reach out to the RISC-V and x86 maintainers to request their reviews and Acks. Best regards, Jinjie >