From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754423AbXGGEfY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:35:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750728AbXGGEfN (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:35:13 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:49160 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699AbXGGEfM (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:35:12 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: cpufreq 'choice' Kconfig oddness in 2.6.22-rc6-mm1.. From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1183782910_7487P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:35:10 -0400 Message-ID: <6443.1183782910@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1183782910_7487P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So I was looking at drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig, and wondering... Is there a specific reason why we have a 'choice' clause that allows selecting 'performance' or 'userspace' as the default governor, and no obvious way to select powersave, ondemand, or conservative as a default? Or was this an oversight I should cook up a patch for? Looks like the Kconfig and a bit of cut-n-paste in include/linux/cpufreq.h is all that's needed? --==_Exmh_1183782910_7487P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFGjxf+cC3lWbTT17ARAp7PAKC7DCT2Og8TKhJKRxrf8fJ4/C3daACgu6jk zQeTZe8wB87w6wq5evJ4SSs= =AuAo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1183782910_7487P--