From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
To: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] staging: vt6655: fix lines of code ending in a '('
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <647b1d2d-f25a-c088-6a0e-0c2a39904150@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6742e42999e05ddf09318a0a3bda9ce23b6ae562.1666849707.git.tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
On 10/28/22 08:39, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> fix several checkpatch errors related to lines ending with a '(' by
> joining splitted lines of code and indenting properly to increase
> visibility
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 165 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> index 1e5036121665..7eb7c6eb5cf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> @@ -139,15 +139,11 @@ static __le16 vnt_time_stamp_off(struct vnt_private *priv, u16 rate)
> * PK_TYPE_11GB 2
> * PK_TYPE_11GA 3
> */
> -static
> -unsigned int
> -s_uGetTxRsvTime(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - unsigned short wRate,
> - bool bNeedAck
> -)
> +static unsigned int s_uGetTxRsvTime(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + unsigned short wRate,
> + bool bNeedAck)
> {
> unsigned int uDataTime, uAckTime;
>
> @@ -214,20 +210,16 @@ static __le16 get_rtscts_time(struct vnt_private *priv,
> }
>
> /* byFreqType 0: 5GHz, 1:2.4Ghz */
> -static
> -unsigned int
> -s_uGetDataDuration(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byDurType,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - unsigned short wRate,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - unsigned int uFragIdx,
> - unsigned int cbLastFragmentSize,
> - unsigned int uMACfragNum,
> - unsigned char byFBOption
> -)
> +static unsigned int s_uGetDataDuration(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byDurType,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + unsigned short wRate,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + unsigned int uFragIdx,
> + unsigned int cbLastFragmentSize,
> + unsigned int uMACfragNum,
> + unsigned char byFBOption)
> {
> bool bLastFrag = false;
> unsigned int uAckTime = 0, uNextPktTime = 0, len;
> @@ -316,17 +308,13 @@ s_uGetDataDuration(
> }
>
> /* byFreqType: 0=>5GHZ 1=>2.4GHZ */
> -static
> -__le16
> -s_uGetRTSCTSDuration(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byDurType,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - unsigned short wRate,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - unsigned char byFBOption
> -)
> +static __le16 s_uGetRTSCTSDuration(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byDurType,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + unsigned short wRate,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + unsigned char byFBOption)
> {
> unsigned int uCTSTime = 0, uDurTime = 0;
>
> @@ -409,22 +397,18 @@ s_uGetRTSCTSDuration(
> return cpu_to_le16((u16)uDurTime);
> }
>
> -static
> -__le16
> -s_uFillDataHead(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - void *pTxDataHead,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - unsigned int uFragIdx,
> - unsigned int cbLastFragmentSize,
> - unsigned int uMACfragNum,
> - unsigned char byFBOption,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> - bool is_pspoll
> -)
> +static __le16 s_uFillDataHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + void *pTxDataHead,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + unsigned int uFragIdx,
> + unsigned int cbLastFragmentSize,
> + unsigned int uMACfragNum,
> + unsigned char byFBOption,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> + bool is_pspoll)
> {
> struct vnt_tx_datahead_ab *buf = pTxDataHead;
>
> @@ -555,19 +539,15 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
> return buf->duration;
> }
>
> -static
> -void
> -s_vFillRTSHead(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - void *pvRTS,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - bool bDisCRC,
> - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> - unsigned char byFBOption
> -)
> +static void s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + void *pvRTS,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + bool bDisCRC,
> + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> + unsigned char byFBOption)
> {
> unsigned int uRTSFrameLen = 20;
>
> @@ -750,19 +730,15 @@ s_vFillRTSHead(
> }
> }
>
> -static
> -void
> -s_vFillCTSHead(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - void *pvCTS,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - bool bDisCRC,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> - unsigned char byFBOption
> -)
> +static void s_vFillCTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + void *pvCTS,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + bool bDisCRC,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> + unsigned char byFBOption)
> {
> unsigned int uCTSFrameLen = 14;
>
> @@ -868,21 +844,17 @@ s_vFillCTSHead(
> -
> * unsigned int cbFrameSize, Hdr+Payload+FCS
> */
> -static
> -void
> -s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *tx_buffer_head,
> - void *pvRrvTime,
> - void *pvRTS,
> - void *pvCTS,
> - unsigned int cbFrameSize,
> - bool bNeedACK,
> - unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> - void *psEthHeader,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate
> -)
> +static void s_vGenerateTxParameter(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *tx_buffer_head,
> + void *pvRrvTime,
> + void *pvRTS,
> + void *pvCTS,
> + unsigned int cbFrameSize,
> + bool bNeedACK,
> + unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> + void *psEthHeader,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate)
> {
> u16 fifo_ctl = le16_to_cpu(tx_buffer_head->fifo_ctl);
> bool bDisCRC = false;
> @@ -954,11 +926,12 @@ s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> }
> }
>
> -static unsigned int
> -s_cbFillTxBufHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice, unsigned char byPktType,
> - unsigned char *pbyTxBufferAddr,
> - unsigned int uDMAIdx, struct vnt_tx_desc *pHeadTD,
> - unsigned int is_pspoll)
> +static unsigned int s_cbFillTxBufHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + unsigned char *pbyTxBufferAddr,
> + unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> + struct vnt_tx_desc *pHeadTD,
> + unsigned int is_pspoll)
> {
> struct vnt_td_info *td_info = pHeadTD->td_info;
> struct sk_buff *skb = td_info->skb;
Patch series coverletter is missing or the wrong one was send.
Changelog is also missing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 6:01 [PATCH v5 0/6] staging: vt6655: a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] staging: vt6655: fix lines ending in a '(' Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v5 " Greg KH
2022-10-28 5:55 ` [PATCH v6 " Philipp Hortmann
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] staging: vt6655: fix lines of code " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 14:57 ` Philipp Hortmann [this message]
2022-10-28 16:42 ` Tanju Brunostar
2022-10-28 17:52 ` Alison Schofield
2022-10-28 17:59 ` Tanju Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] staging: vt6655: refactor code in s_uGetRTSCTSDuration Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:37 ` Greg KH
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 " Greg KH
2022-10-27 13:09 ` Tanju Brunostar
2022-10-27 14:50 ` Greg KH
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] staging: vt6655: split code lines " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] staging: vt6655: refactor code in s_uFillDataHead Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] staging: vt6655: split long lines of " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] staging: vt6655: refactor code in s_vGenerateTxParameter Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] staging: vt6655: split long lines of " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] staging: vt6655: refactor code in the rest of the file Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] staging: vt6655: split long lines of code in " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] staging: vt6655: refactor code to avoid a line ending in '(' Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v6 " Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 6:39 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] staging: vt6655: fix lines of code ending in a '(' Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 17:40 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] staging: vt6655: a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-27 9:05 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
2022-10-28 6:34 ` Tanjuate Brunostar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=647b1d2d-f25a-c088-6a0e-0c2a39904150@gmail.com \
--to=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®