mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"Rohan McLure" <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Kevin Brodsky" <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Andrew Donnellan" <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] arm64: hugetlbpage: avoid unused-but-set-parameter warning (gcc-16)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:48:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6482195e-5230-468c-95ac-625da1b233d8@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7711ebd-02fb-4cab-ade3-f4ff2f738de9@arm.com>

On Mon, Feb 16, 2026, at 07:31, Dev Jain wrote:
> On 13/02/26 9:52 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>>
>> The issue here is that __pte_clear() does not actually use its second
>> argument when CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE is disabled.
>
> But that is true even when the config is on? __pte_clear has an 
> unconditional definition.
>

No, you're right. I'll rephrase the changelog and send a v3.

When CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE is disabled, the warning doesn't
appear because the argument is unused by never changed as the
loop collapses into a single call.

     Arnd

      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-16 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-13 16:22 Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-16  6:31 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-16 11:48   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6482195e-5230-468c-95ac-625da1b233d8@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®