From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<dave.jiang@intel.com>, <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <terry.bowman@amd.com>, <rrichter@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 08/26] cxl/acpi: Directly bind the CEDT detected CHBCR to the Host Bridge's port
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:24:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6482a98cde722_1433ac29444@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607221651.2454764-9-terry.bowman@amd.com>
Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
>
> During a Host Bridge's downstream port enumeration the CHBS entries in
> the CEDT table are parsed, its Component Register base address
> extracted and then stored in struct cxl_dport. The CHBS may contain
> either the RCRB (RCH mode) or the Host Bridge's Component Registers
> (CHBCR, VH mode). The RCRB further contains the CXL downstream port
> register base address, while in VH mode the CXL Downstream Switch
> Ports are visible in the PCI hierarchy and the DP's component regs are
> disovered using the CXL DVSEC register locator capability. The
> Component Registers derived from the CHBS for both modes are different
> and thus also must be treated differently. That is, in RCH mode, the
> component regs base should be bound to the dport, but in VH mode to
> the CXL host bridge's port object.
>
> The current implementation stores the CHBCR in addition in struct
> cxl_dport and copies it later from there to struct cxl_port. As a
> result, the dport contains the wrong Component Registers base address
> and, e.g. the RAS capability of a CXL Root Port cannot be detected.
>
> To fix the CHBCR binding, attach it directly to the Host Bridge's
> @cxl_port structure. Do this during port creation of the Host Bridge
> in add_host_bridge_uport(). Factor out CHBS parsing code in
> add_host_bridge_dport() and use it in both functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
I like where this patch is going. I needed to rebase and fix it up to
get cxl_test working again, and spotted some additional cleanups along
the way. I notice that after this patch dport->component_reg_phys is
totally unused. So I would like to see that removal patch comes next in
the series before going into the port->component_reg_phys reworks.
-- >8 --
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
index eb64dc7a3d8d..7df6c6f5e902 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx = arg;
struct acpi_cedt_chbs *chbs;
- if (ctx->base)
+ if (ctx->base != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
return 0;
chbs = (struct acpi_cedt_chbs *) header;
@@ -350,8 +350,6 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
return 0;
ctx->cxl_version = chbs->cxl_version;
- ctx->base = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
-
if (!chbs->base)
return 0;
@@ -364,17 +362,26 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
return 0;
}
-static int cxl_get_chbs(struct acpi_device *hb, struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx)
+static int cxl_get_chbs(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *hb,
+ struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx)
{
unsigned long long uid;
int rc;
rc = acpi_evaluate_integer(hb->handle, METHOD_NAME__UID, NULL, &uid);
- if (rc != AE_OK)
+ if (rc != AE_OK) {
+ dev_err(dev, "unable to retrieve _UID\n");
return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "UID found: %lld\n", uid);
+ *ctx = (struct cxl_chbs_context) {
+ .dev = dev,
+ .uid = uid,
+ .base = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE,
+ .cxl_version = UINT_MAX,
+ };
- memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
- ctx->uid = uid;
acpi_table_parse_cedt(ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS, cxl_get_chbs_iter, ctx);
return 0;
@@ -384,7 +391,6 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
{
acpi_status rc;
struct device *bridge;
- unsigned long long uid;
struct cxl_dport *dport;
struct cxl_chbs_context ctx;
struct acpi_pci_root *pci_root;
@@ -395,24 +401,19 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
if (!hb)
return 0;
- rc = cxl_get_chbs(hb, &ctx);
- if (rc == -ENOENT)
- dev_err(match, "unable to retrieve _UID\n");
+ rc = cxl_get_chbs(match, hb, &ctx);
if (rc)
return rc;
- uid = ctx.uid;
- dev_dbg(match, "UID found: %lld\n", uid);
-
- if (!ctx.base) {
+ if (ctx.cxl_version == UINT_MAX) {
dev_warn(match, "No CHBS found for Host Bridge (UID %lld)\n",
- uid);
+ ctx.uid);
return 0;
}
if (ctx.base == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
dev_warn(match, "CHBS invalid for Host Bridge (UID %lld)\n",
- uid);
+ ctx.uid);
return 0;
}
@@ -425,10 +426,12 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
* object later in add_host_bridge_uport().
*/
if (ctx.cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11) {
- dev_dbg(match, "RCRB found for UID %lld: %pa\n", uid, &ctx.base);
- dport = devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(root_port, bridge, uid, ctx.base);
+ dev_dbg(match, "RCRB found for UID %lld: %pa\n", ctx.uid,
+ &ctx.base);
+ dport = devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(root_port, bridge, ctx.uid,
+ ctx.base);
} else {
- dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, bridge, uid,
+ dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, bridge, ctx.uid,
CXL_RESOURCE_NONE);
}
@@ -471,19 +474,17 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
return 0;
}
- rc = cxl_get_chbs(hb, &ctx);
+ rc = cxl_get_chbs(match, hb, &ctx);
if (rc)
return rc;
- if (ctx.cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11)
- /* RCH mode, should never happen */
+ if (ctx.cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11) {
+ dev_warn(bridge,
+ "CXL CHBS version mismatch, skip port registration\n");
return 0;
+ }
- if (ctx.base)
- component_reg_phys = ctx.base;
- else
- component_reg_phys = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
-
+ component_reg_phys = ctx.base;
if (component_reg_phys != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
dev_dbg(match, "CHBCR found for UID %lld: %pa\n",
ctx.uid, &component_reg_phys);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 22:16 [PATCH v5 00/26] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 01/26] cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creation Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 1:03 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-08 1:11 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 02/26] cxl/rch: Prepare for caching the MMIO mapped PCIe AER capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 4:53 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 03/26] cxl: Rename member @dport of struct cxl_dport to @dev Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 6:42 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-08 14:36 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 19:08 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-08 19:22 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 04/26] cxl/core/regs: Rename phys_addr in cxl_map_component_regs() Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 6:47 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 05/26] cxl/core/regs: Add @dev to cxl_register_map Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 19:29 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-08 21:50 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 06/26] cxl/pci: Refactor component register discovery for reuse Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 19:57 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 07/26] cxl/acpi: Moving add_host_bridge_uport() around Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 20:02 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-08 21:50 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 08/26] cxl/acpi: Directly bind the CEDT detected CHBCR to the Host Bridge's port Terry Bowman
2023-06-09 4:24 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 09/26] cxl/regs: Remove early capability checks in Component Register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 0:18 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 10/26] cxl/mem: Prepare for early RCH dport component register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 0:26 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 11/26] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRB Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 1:36 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-10 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-12 20:39 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 12/26] cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:18 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 13/26] cxl/port: Store the downstream port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:23 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 14/26] cxl/pci: Store the endpoint's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:29 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 15/26] cxl/hdm: Use stored Component Register mappings to map HDM decoder capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:34 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 16/26] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:36 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 17/26] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:37 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 18/26] cxl/pci: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 2:38 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 19/26] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discovery Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 3:09 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-12 14:41 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 20/26] PCI/AER: Refactor cper_print_aer() for use by CXL driver module Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 3:11 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 21/26] cxl/pci: Update CXL error logging to use RAS register address Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 3:12 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-12 21:12 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 22/26] cxl/pci: Map RCH downstream AER registers for logging protocol errors Terry Bowman
2023-06-10 3:23 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-12 18:19 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 23/26] cxl/pci: Disable root port interrupts in RCH mode Terry Bowman
2023-06-12 20:29 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-13 15:28 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 24/26] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port error logging Terry Bowman
2023-06-12 21:38 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-16 16:17 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-16 16:28 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 25/26] PCI/AER: Forward RCH downstream port-detected errors to the CXL.mem dev handler Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 22:54 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-12 22:49 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 26/26] PCI/AER: Unmask RCEC internal errors to enable RCH downstream port error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-08 19:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-12 22:57 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6482a98cde722_1433ac29444@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®