From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A1E357721; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762446001; cv=none; b=nqMHvEKgWahtJFYvN6HTg3EpjF1YnPfKsmNfqZH5p7ckQNF09IZwBc5Th0LD1aHDHSLpiKwp5oYAPLdNjgv3kqUMUhzopp9c3zH4JawdFL1W7w0SNT663q1VZsSTrpXF2H+2LlKKrhj0LYK5liO9j+9muiovp/QrkBtQ00ToaTM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762446001; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OVcOtVk12b2dUh33QkalNDOXz+aQqlvRcKVr+4p/xFo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:CC:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=DsDfoemOeNIEJmJjYQnHE7IiSkRMY58m/gOkMmNQl6E1KJ3o2BRLkMhGo5bWUCaucOcpCpgo51vmCDKiZZxGaD4vB0jHOW08CvzBHdIPXJ2asRn57moBDbfD8FHwrf1MHmmkeoyZGlBaZ1kGt2PSDTXgep/2btOSJPqNj+g5MH8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d2S7m0blvzJ46Dq; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 00:19:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.188.26.250]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134F1140277; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 00:19:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.123.122.223] (10.123.122.223) by mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 19:19:54 +0300 Message-ID: <64893d23-157c-4cd4-b1d6-5f120bba7a03@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 19:19:54 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/14] ipvlan: Support GSO for port -> ipvlan From: Dmitry Skorodumov To: Eric Dumazet CC: , , , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni References: <20251105161450.1730216-1-skorodumov.dmitry@huawei.com> <20251105161450.1730216-7-skorodumov.dmitry@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: mscpeml100003.china.huawei.com (10.199.174.67) To mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.250) On 06.11.2025 18:41, Dmitry Skorodumov wrote: > I see that currently there is no any tests for this ipvlan module (may be I missed something).. Do you have any ideas about tests? I'm a bit  confused at the moment: designing tests from scratch - this might be a bit tricky. > > Or it is enough just describe test-cases I checked manually (in some of the patches of the series)? > I just got few ideas how to implement tests.. I think I'll provide some tests, at least for the new functionality. Dmitry