Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] gve: Add adminq extended command

[David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>]

On 2024-05-07 15:59, Ziwei Xiao wrote:
> From: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>
> 
> Add a new device option to signal to the driver that the device supports
> flow steering. This device option also carries the maximum number of
> flow steering rules that the device can store.

Other than superficial style choices, looks good.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h        |  2 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.h | 11 +++++
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
> index ca7fce17f2c0..58213c15e084 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
> @@ -786,6 +786,8 @@ struct gve_priv {
>  
>  	u16 header_buf_size; /* device configured, header-split supported if non-zero */
>  	bool header_split_enabled; /* True if the header split is enabled by the user */
> +
> +	u32 max_flow_rules;

nit: this struct is lovingly documented, could we continue by adding a
one liner here maybe about how it's device configured?

>  };
>  
>  enum gve_service_task_flags_bit {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
> index 514641b3ccc7..85d0d742ad21 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ void gve_parse_device_option(struct gve_priv *priv,
>  			     struct gve_device_option_jumbo_frames **dev_op_jumbo_frames,
>  			     struct gve_device_option_dqo_qpl **dev_op_dqo_qpl,
>  			     struct gve_device_option_buffer_sizes **dev_op_buffer_sizes,
> +			     struct gve_device_option_flow_steering **dev_op_flow_steering,

nit: getting unwieldy here, is it time to pack into a struct?