From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine2.igalia.com [213.97.179.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49CE2EF640 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756730997; cv=none; b=GFg7JgBp5jnsYh5bUUHDfwGEYyfPdnj/YvNMXsK1JLoxVD6XlpzYCeexcKOjnJ9zCr5ZGCuV7bZI7AfCXskq0/UwblxKvIHvA7RYLHD3bGUox6PSXJqTUPHiRO0Y7YZOVaGg1SMtdQ+4gpy9VfsYMesHkJsbvwg3Yg5sUgqxlhE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756730997; c=relaxed/simple; bh=61kd+4Uh5eUaetLQwDmSpGhLikrHVTzdJBd+QsZ2wK8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=e++N3NT2ObUWp4gzlmfAWumuNW4yfd0sAPuoS5zDmfJgYbROrd7LlseT5AJ5+AMq8NyV/tWhSV3EEe5ktFZPFFPyojjij6S5wTdbw/eTo4r7pMjzF7QV+pHtg+SuHyE/Z7RvFcfHkgDLQQ90JV1+8dCs7DyVhIsGIST3cUMJSbI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b=oN9NZVgu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b="oN9NZVgu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=t3MQM1w3G9lfKRXuWcixWsGlqJJzDy54KOrmwwhieUc=; b=oN9NZVgup+nTqj9469cHbgMJmj pRuonB78Gb1VntfuZRq0k3nTtlYyeX7zSwdjbunEiUthcygKkQC1MDgzmXOzeShfbWKf+b2X5kyzg xpNnfO5BiuJfMh3/27v9wjLedLWhlPvsEVSqfQ2JF68yssB6yS24by3U6M69CQxOlClQ/0YWqho5f qEI7aBXtVCuCR6kIQU3be2zbvupbwvjfKBxspURQkvjHvi3TNUjNuavLAOC47OfowZta0qydoX2SL eo0/vKiNhI9rsSiti4EMOxDE/JNN0uswSUQhj60RLtHAGPPfJxTSOzUkpww0Sw2eCTXtn3j2/FKrU x/mSXSQg==; Received: from [177.139.20.31] (helo=[192.168.15.100]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1ut3yJ-005Hj0-9N; Mon, 01 Sep 2025 14:49:19 +0200 Message-ID: <64deb0ae-5641-4ceb-889e-0ef1087175fb@igalia.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:49:14 -0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix futex_numa_mpol's memory out of range subtest To: Borislav Petkov , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Waiman Long , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250827154420.1292208-1-andrealmeid@igalia.com> <9d4c0d27-0ebd-4c6d-af38-d32ef420fde4@redhat.com> <61725722-f933-447c-a041-71b2d28e7f90@igalia.com> <20250828182037.qkdKVaTN@linutronix.de> <20250829061624.sC9Bavj9@linutronix.de> <20250829100705.GBaLF7ycOvksu9H6KN@fat_crate.local> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: <20250829100705.GBaLF7ycOvksu9H6KN@fat_crate.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em 29/08/2025 07:07, Borislav Petkov escreveu: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:16:24AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> No objections merging Waiman fix first, but we are still in -rc3, so maybe >>> there's time for the rework in this cycle? > > ... and you can rework all you want. When your solution is ready and everyone > agrees, there's nothing wrong with queueing it ontop or delaying it for the > next merge window. > >> On the regression list, we this one fallout in the testsuite. I would >> like to get an easy fix for -rc4 and be done with it for this cycle. > > There's absolutely no place for hurrying things, especially for self tests. So > take your time pls. > Sure, I don't want to hurry things, I'm just trying to understand better the rationale of having this for the next cycle, and if I would have to wait or not till the next kernel release to send the patch :)