From: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: stmfx: fix valid_mask init sequence
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:14:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64f8096f-cec6-fef1-5a4e-ddca3bf8c73d@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb1c-NHXDQXYS78VTcGPnJApmxjzZbF_cM8SUknhDiQ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/5/19 3:32 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:09 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> wrote:
>
>> With stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_init_valid_mask callback, gpio_valid_mask was used
>> to initialize gpiochip valid_mask for gpiolib. But gpio_valid_mask was not
>> yet initialized. gpio_valid_mask required gpio-ranges to be registered,
>> this is the case after gpiochip_add_data call. But init_valid_mask
>> callback is also called under gpiochip_add_data. gpio_valid_mask
>> initialization cannot be moved before gpiochip_add_data because
>> gpio-ranges are not registered.
>
> Sorry but this doesn't add up, look at this call graph:
>
> gpiochip_add_data()
> gpiochip_add_data_with_key()
> gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask()
> of_gpiochip_add()
> of_gpiochip_add_pin_range()
> gpiochip_init_valid_mask()
>
> So the .initi_valid_mask() is clearly called *after*
> of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() so this cannot be the real reason,
> provided that the ranges come from the device tree. AFAICT that
> is the case with the stmfx.
>
> Can you check and see if the problem is something else?
>
stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_init_valid_mask uses pctl->gpio_valid_mask to
initialize gpiochip valid_mask.
pctl->gpio_valid_mask is initialized in
stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable depending on gpio ranges.
stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable is called after gpiochip_add_data
because it requires gpio ranges to be registered.
So, in stmfx driver the call graph is
stmfx_pinctrl_probe
gpiochip_add_data()
gpiochip_add_data_with_key()
gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask()
of_gpiochip_add()
of_gpiochip_add_pin_range()
gpiochip_init_valid_mask()
stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_init_valid_mask (but pctl->gpio_valid_mask
is not yet initialized so gpiochip valid_mask is wrong)
stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable (pctl->gpio_valid_mask is going to
be initialized thanks to gpio ranges)
When consumer tries to take a pin (it is the case for the joystick on
stm32mp157c-ev1), it gets the following issue:
[ 3.347391] irq: :soc:i2c@40013000:stmfx@42:stmfx-pin-controller
didn't like hwirq-0x0 to VIRQ92 mapping (rc=-6)
[ 3.356418] irq: :soc:i2c@40013000:stmfx@42:stmfx-pin-controller
didn't like hwirq-0x1 to VIRQ92 mapping (rc=-6)
[ 3.366512] irq: :soc:i2c@40013000:stmfx@42:stmfx-pin-controller
didn't like hwirq-0x2 to VIRQ92 mapping (rc=-6)
[ 3.376671] irq: :soc:i2c@40013000:stmfx@42:stmfx-pin-controller
didn't like hwirq-0x3 to VIRQ92 mapping (rc=-6)
[ 3.387169] irq: :soc:i2c@40013000:stmfx@42:stmfx-pin-controller
didn't like hwirq-0x4 to VIRQ92 mapping (rc=-6)
[ 3.397065] gpio-keys joystick: Found button without gpio or irq
[ 3.403041] gpio-keys: probe of joystick failed with error -22
I can reword the commit message to make it clearer.
Regards,
Amelie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-04 10:09 Amelie Delaunay
2019-11-04 10:22 ` Alexandre Torgue
2019-11-05 14:32 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-05 15:14 ` Amelie DELAUNAY [this message]
2019-11-07 9:09 ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-07 9:24 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-11-07 9:07 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64f8096f-cec6-fef1-5a4e-ddca3bf8c73d@st.com \
--to=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®