From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751187AbdKHIwu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 8 Nov 2017 03:52:50 -0500
Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:49395 "EHLO
        heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750720AbdKHIwr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 8 Nov 2017 03:52:47 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,368,1503331200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="30008847"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/tsc: remove tsc_disabled flag
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
References: <20171102172644.28555-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
 <20171102172644.28555-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
 <f3bb2e30-1209-ac23-b007-d59c23a5bd24@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <CAOAebxtc6v+fvwYJ_eqTCC=AndStRhR=vwoembyywTy2WNYH2g@mail.gmail.com>
CC: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <651534c5-5095-4b93-dbdf-e4808cc0eaee@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:52:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOAebxtc6v+fvwYJ_eqTCC=AndStRhR=vwoembyywTy2WNYH2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.106]
X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 794F948089C9.AA273
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Pavel,

At 11/03/2017 10:23 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Hi Dou,
>
> Sure, I can remove the warning, but I think we should print something
> that is indicating that notsc is not a good parameter anymore: i.e
> tsc=unstable is better. Perhaps something like:
> "Kernel parameter \'notsc\'  is deprecated, please use
> \'tsc=unstable\' instead" ?
>

IMO, we already have a message by

mark_tsc_unstable("boot parameter notsc");

and we will use 'notsc' in case of CONFIG_X86_TSC = no

So, I guess there is no need to print this msg.

Thanks,
	dou.

> Pasha