From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 07:22:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 07:22:48 -0400 Received: from [202.54.26.202] ([202.54.26.202]:46494 "EHLO hindon.hss.co.in") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 07:22:41 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: HSS From: alad@hss.hns.com To: Zdenek Kabelac cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <65256A25.003D0DBC.00@sandesh.hss.hns.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:44:01 +0530 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better scheduler Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This concept I think is used in Solaris .. as they have dynamic loadable schedulers.. Zdenek Kabelac on 04/05/2001 05:43:15 PM To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: (bcc: Amol Lad/HSS) Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hello Just dump idea - why not make scheduler switchable with modules - so users could select any scheduler they want ? This should not be that hard and would make it easy to replace scheduler at runtime so everyone could easily try what's the best for him/her. kabi@i.am - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/