mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@gmail.com>
To: andrew.j.wade@gmail.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18 V7] drivers: add lcd display support
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:40:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <653402b90610021440h2e416394r55227ce5e7eb6171@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610021449.08640.ajwade@cpe001346162bf9-cm0011ae8cd564.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com>

On 10/2/06, Andrew James Wade <andrew.j.wade@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2006 08:53, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > Sure it is wrong, the point is what is the best to understading. "LCD
> > display" seems better to me than just "LC display".
>
> To me too. Acronyms tend to be treated as opaque tokens in English:
> their expansions tend not be be well known and don't really interact
> with their usage. "LCD display" is fine, and is clearer than both
> "LCD" or "liquid crystal display". (Some users won't know that a
> "liquid crystal display" is what they know as an "LCD display").
>
> Andrew Wade
>

I agree. As I said, in other languages is also common to use "LCD" as
a adjective, not as a noun.

Andrew, can you tell me how should I name it? So I will be able to
change it (if apply) and send the V8 patch.

I wish V8 will be the final patch...

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-02 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-30 23:24 Miguel Ojeda Sandonis
2006-10-01 12:53 ` Miguel Ojeda
2006-10-01 13:51   ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-01 14:25     ` Miguel Ojeda
2006-10-01 16:48       ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-01 17:58         ` Miguel Ojeda
2008-04-28 23:36           ` monitordelcd
2006-10-01 16:05     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-01 16:17       ` Andreas Schwab
2006-10-01 17:33         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-01 16:43       ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-01 17:27         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2006-10-01 17:52           ` Miguel Ojeda
2006-10-01 18:25             ` Alexander van Heukelum
2006-10-01 16:53       ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-02 18:49   ` Andrew James Wade
2006-10-02 21:40     ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2006-10-03  0:06       ` Andrew James Wade
2006-10-03 12:55         ` Miguel Ojeda
2006-10-03 15:29           ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-02 22:06     ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 21:45       ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=653402b90610021440h2e416394r55227ce5e7eb6171@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=maxextreme@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrew.j.wade@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®