From: "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@gmail.com>
To: "Luca Tettamanti" <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"oliver pinter" <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>,
"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: [BUG? -rc7] SMP: Just one CPU activated: P4 3GHz HT
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:11:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <653402b90704230111p50b72586te73c1288f12a0079@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462BF4DF.7080401@shaw.ca>
On 4/22/07, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably the two siblings are enumerated only in ACPI tables. If you
> disable ACPI the kernel won't be aware of the second "core".
>
> Luca
> --
> "Su cio` di cui non si puo` parlare e` bene tacere".
> Ludwig Wittgenstein
>
On 4/23/07, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> You didn't enable ACPI, it's needed for almost all systems to detect HT
> and also for many systems to detect multi-cores as well.
>
> Aside from that, in general I would say that on any modern x86 system
> ACPI should always be enabled. In many cases it seems the BIOS code is
> not tested much without ACPI anymore, so going without ACPI can be
> problematic.
>
> --
> Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
> To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
> Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
>
>
Thanks all of you. It seems the problem is ACPI, however, should not
it be noted in some way? Maybe at Documentation/smp.txt, maybe at the
help section at CONFIG_SMP, maybe a "depends on ..."
Or maybe CONFIG_SMP should enable some bits of the ACPI code needed to
detect such additional cores.
--
Miguel Ojeda
http://maxextreme.googlepages.com/index.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-23 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.2kDN6AWFnkWM37pP5//wKJmbvRQ@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-22 23:50 ` Robert Hancock
2007-04-23 8:11 ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2007-04-27 20:02 ` Luca Tettamanti
2007-04-22 8:57 Miguel Ojeda
[not found] ` <6101e8c40704220300n4cfef0f1l652b303f5bab8d1b@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-22 10:12 ` Miguel Ojeda
[not found] ` <6101e8c40704220453v544dce39j9e348939b3cb1f2e@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-22 12:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2007-04-22 16:11 ` Luca Tettamanti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=653402b90704230111p50b72586te73c1288f12a0079@mail.gmail.com \
--to=maxextreme@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.pntr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®