From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161309AbXDWSgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:36:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161327AbXDWSgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:36:19 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.180]:11252 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161309AbXDWSgR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:36:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gdefvI4jLwDW5Ue48XMH6OOuADvtMuX/OeiTkW3XGVWivRRf1HeAabJhbnSLHp7en9wvc/bFm9rYHP1z1NT6eU6ZVrvaJBfS8UUrKa8ZenRW/mJF43DmHtlTAKbskOnCGjTBZHkV+XbkErkw+Up+OYqrjSEGAXv0Ek6AFxueZiE= Message-ID: <653402b90704231136x6f28c2b6i28a3a28dd840ab14@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:36:15 +0200 From: "Miguel Ojeda" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: Question about Reiser4 Cc: "Eric Hopper" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070423104042.87b50bb3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070423020046.GA28477@omnifarious.org> <462C4858.3050006@redhat.com> <462C4D32.4000909@redhat.com> <462C5034.9090403@redhat.com> <20070423010445.454eda63.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070423135216.GA2744@omnifarious.org> <20070423104042.87b50bb3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/23/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > To get it unstuck we'd need a general push, get people looking at and > testing > the code, get the vendors to have a serious think about it, etc. We could > do > that - it'd require that the namesys people (and I) start making threatening > noises about merging it, I guess. > > Or we could move all the reiser4 code into kernel/sched.c - that seems to > get > people fired up. > - Just an idea: And what about creating a new tree (like -r4), maintained by namesys people, tested by several people, with dedicated mailing list, etc.? That way, the code could be patched, updated and cleaned over the time (without firing up people), it could be tested without pain, people would send more bug reports and every work would be centralized. Reiser4 would get much more attention. -- Miguel Ojeda http://maxextreme.googlepages.com/index.htm