From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2: Patch 1/3] net: hand off skb list to other cpu to submit to upper layer
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:53:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65634d660903160953o563385f8p29c0da5e3128f6f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090314.114522.19720687.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:45 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:15:21 -0700
>
> > I suppose it may be counter-intuitive, but I am not making a general
> > claim. I would only suggest that these software hacks could be a very
> > good approximation or substitute for hardware functionality. This is
> > a generic way to get more performance out of deficient or lower end
> > NICs.
>
> They certainly could. Why don't you post the current version
> of your patches so we have something concrete to discuss?
I'll do that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 8:53 Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-11 11:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-12 8:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-03-13 6:43 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-13 17:06 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 18:51 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 21:01 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 22:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-03-13 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <65634d660903131358h765bef64y6a0f1b0db7400f6f@mail.gmail.com>
2009-03-13 21:02 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 21:59 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-13 22:19 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 23:58 ` Herbert Xu
2009-03-14 0:24 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-14 1:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-14 2:19 ` David Miller
2009-03-14 13:19 ` Herbert Xu
2009-03-14 18:15 ` Tom Herbert
2009-03-14 18:45 ` David Miller
2009-03-16 16:53 ` Tom Herbert [this message]
2009-03-14 1:51 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-16 3:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-03-12 14:34 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-13 9:06 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65634d660903160953o563385f8p29c0da5e3128f6f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=therbert@google.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®