mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
To: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION] Build failure on 6.9-rc2 with "x86/bugs: Fix the SRSO mitigation on Zen3/4"
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:05:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <658b2641-1f06-4680-8bf9-87b64ad5241d@o2.pl> (raw)

Hello,

The v6.9-rc2 kernel fails to build without CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO but
with most other mitigations in place (incl. CONFIG_MITIGATION_UNRET_ENTRY):

[...]
      LD      vmlinux.o
      OBJCOPY modules.builtin.modinfo
      GEN     modules.builtin
      GEN     .vmlinux.objs
      MODPOST Module.symvers
    ERROR: modpost: "srso_alias_untrain_ret" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-amd.ko] undefined!
    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:145: Module.symvers] Błąd 1
    make[1]: *** [/media/1T-data/linux/linux-6.9-rc2/Makefile:1871: modpost] Błąd 2
    make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Błąd 2
    Command exited with non-zero status 2

An investigation pointed to the following commit:

commit 4535e1a4174c4111d92c5a9a21e542d232e0fcaa
Author: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Date:   Thu Mar 28 13:59:05 2024 +0100

    x86/bugs: Fix the SRSO mitigation on Zen3/4
    
    The original version of the mitigation would patch in the calls to the
    untraining routines directly.  That is, the alternative() in UNTRAIN_RET
    will patch in the CALL to srso_alias_untrain_ret() directly.
    
    However, even if commit e7c25c441e9e ("x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain
    mess") meant well in trying to clean up the situation, due to micro-
    architectural reasons, the untraining routine srso_alias_untrain_ret()
    must be the target of a CALL instruction and not of a JMP instruction as
    it is done now.
    
    Reshuffle the alternative macros to accomplish that.
    
    Fixes: e7c25c441e9e ("x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess")
    Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
    Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
    Cc: stable@kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

After reverting it, the kernel builds successfully.

Config extract:

    CONFIG_CC_HAS_RETURN_THUNK=y
    CONFIG_CC_HAS_ENTRY_PADDING=y
    CONFIG_FUNCTION_PADDING_CFI=11
    CONFIG_FUNCTION_PADDING_BYTES=16
    CONFIG_CALL_PADDING=y
    CONFIG_HAVE_CALL_THUNKS=y
    CONFIG_CALL_THUNKS=y
    CONFIG_PREFIX_SYMBOLS=y
    CONFIG_SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_UNRET_ENTRY=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING=y
    # CONFIG_CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG is not set
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBPB_ENTRY=y
    CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBRS_ENTRY=y
    # CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO is not set
    # CONFIG_MITIGATION_GDS_FORCE is not set
    # CONFIG_MITIGATION_RFDS is not set
    CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ADD_PAGES=y

OS: Ubuntu 20.04, GCC 9.4.0

To me, it looks that with the patch applied, arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h uses
srso_alias_untrain_ret when CONFIG_MITIGATION_UNRET_ENTRY=y
even though CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO=n.

Greetings,

Mateusz


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 21:05 Mateusz Jończyk [this message]
2024-04-05  0:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-06 19:04   ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-04-06 19:53     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=658b2641-1f06-4680-8bf9-87b64ad5241d@o2.pl \
    --to=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®