From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753245Ab1IBQIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:58227 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752856Ab1IBQIA (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:08:00 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next RCU complaint during boot In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:53:32 +0200." <20110902015330.GA28121@somewhere.redhat.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <8867.1314894817@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20110902014424.GB2405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110902015330.GA28121@somewhere.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1314979603_2710P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:06:43 -0400 Message-ID: <6595.1314979603@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020B.4E60FF17.00EC,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1314979603_2710P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:53:32 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker said: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:44:24PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > This is a bug where someone uses RCU at a time when RCU has been told > > that the CPU is in dyntick-idle mode. Frederic Weisbecker has some > > patches that should address this. > > Yep, see there: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/20/81 Hmm.. .would test, but didn't apply cleanly to -next from Wednesday. Of course, I was trying to do it before corn flakes, so I probably got the patches out of order. WIll re-try this evening if I get a chance. --==_Exmh_1314979603_2710P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD4DBQFOYP8TcC3lWbTT17ARAumUAJ4609ziLbsR2wfq/kcoPuMGjNU96QCXQ1+m yywB+X3tClZYNNKRokkSLA== =RrNe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1314979603_2710P--