From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932164AbWITRmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:42:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932169AbWITRme (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:42:34 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.12]:19390 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932164AbWITRmd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:42:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=G9xtDlt/OsWOI+Oy/obgoextNMCTV8K1I9v5PtwYGUlw6UU0e5qQMaFoOL2pBWWQQ rYdENC+3u96a9sAGr6ghg== Message-ID: <6599ad830609201042n7948a9e1s6cf70d0da04447f4@mail.google.com> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:42:24 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Christoph Lameter" Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction Cc: "Rohit Seth" , npiggin@suse.de, pj@sgi.com, linux-kernel , devel@openvz.org, CKRM-Tech In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158773208.8574.53.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/20/06, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I think we should have one container mechanism instead of multiple. Maybe > merge the two? The cpuset functionality is well established and working > right. The basic container abstraction provided by cpusets is very nice - maybe rename it from "cpuset" to "container"? Since it already provides access to memory nodes as well as cpus, and could be extended to handle other resource types too (network, disk). Paul