From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: sekharan@us.ibm.com
Cc: pj@sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, winget@google.com,
mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com, jlan@sgi.com,
Joel.Becker@oracle.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:49:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830610041449v5dfd9ef3r4fb1e3453a8e6144@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830610041440n74056262v63528c0d22ca5cb8@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/4/06, Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote:
>
> > > > - Tight coupling of subsystems: I like your idea (you mentioned in a
> > > > reply to the previous thread) of having an array of containers in task
> > > > structure than the current implementation.
> > >
...
BTW, that's not to say that having parallel hierarchies of containers
is necessarily a bad thing - I can imagine just mounting multiple
instances of containerfs, each managing one of the container pointers
in task_struct - but I think that could be added on afterwards. Even
if we did have the parallel support, we'd still need to support
multiple subsystems/controllers on the same hierarchy, since I think
that's going to be the much more common case.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-04 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 9:53 Paul Menage
2006-10-02 9:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code Paul Menage
2006-10-02 9:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] Cpusets hooked into containers Paul Menage
2006-10-02 9:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers Paul Menage
2006-10-02 9:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] Simple CPU accounting container subsystem Paul Menage
2006-10-04 1:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system Chandra Seetharaman
2006-10-04 2:34 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-04 4:43 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-04 18:56 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-10-04 19:36 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-04 21:37 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-10-04 21:42 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-04 21:40 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-04 21:49 ` Paul Menage [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-28 10:40 menage
2006-09-28 18:49 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-28 19:00 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-29 4:31 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830610041449v5dfd9ef3r4fb1e3453a8e6144@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=winget@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome