From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759178AbWK3Ivk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:51:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759180AbWK3Ivk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:51:40 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:41945 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759177AbWK3Ivj (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:51:39 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=pdfzSyiuDzuw35a3fzwpnZQY9+T8fWzEtT8QIsmCgkmQejqgPC99b/KdYg41TUOP3 ee0OyRLGgbjuJYLrVxpow== Message-ID: <6599ad830611300051q5f48fb45gbfae9649e0e14524@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:51:26 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Paul Jackson" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters) Cc: akpm@osdl.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, dev@sw.ru, xemul@sw.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@openvz.org, mbligh@google.com, winget@google.com, rohitseth@google.com In-Reply-To: <20061129233229.a47e0f1b.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061123120848.051048000@menage.corp.google.com> <20061129233229.a47e0f1b.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/29/06, Paul Jackson wrote: > > 2) I wedged the kernel on the container_lock, doing a removal of a cpuset > using notify_on_release. I couldn't reproduce this, with a /sbin/cpuset_release_agent that does: #!/bin/bash logger cpuset_release_agent $1 rmdir /dev/cpuset/$1 and running the commands: while true; do mkdir -p /dev/cpuset/bar/foo echo 1 > /dev/cpuset/bar/notify_on_release rmdir /dev/cpuset/bar/foo usleep 1000 done Is it actually reproducible for you? If so, could you get a fuller backtrace? Thanks, Paul