From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161607AbXDYFAF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161608AbXDYFAF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:5735 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161607AbXDYFAB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=LgBEXWH7WUsSsOiyNn45e0vMJYm0HCAeJIbTHvf23xACUVnXzXImi3MXNvZqbNKtO GSMMUYKmp9Jz+s/DheErg== Message-ID: <6599ad830704242159k6f889c51v104aeb863b04d5e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:59:40 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Vaidyanathan Srinivasan" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Containers (V8): Cpusets hooked into containers Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, dev@sw.ru, xemul@sw.ru, serue@us.ibm.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com, devel@openvz.org In-Reply-To: <462C9001.7060403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070406233221.989528000@menage.corp.google.com> <20070407001324.090764000@menage.corp.google.com> <462C9001.7060403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/23/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote: > > > > config CONTAINERS > > - bool "Container support" > > - help > > - This option will let you create and manage process containers, > > - which can be used to aggregate multiple processes, e.g. for > > - the purposes of resource tracking. > > - > > - Say N if unsure > > + bool > > Hi Paul, > > This looks like some patch generation error. Description for > containers should not be removed after applying this patch. No, this is intentional - in the first patch in the series, CONFIG_CONTAINER was a user-selectable option so it had a description; in the second it becomes an option that's only selected if other selected systems (e.g. cpusets) depend on it. So it no longer needs help text. Cheers, Paul