From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763077AbXFIIVQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 04:21:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756459AbXFIIVF (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 04:21:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:48439 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752417AbXFIIVD (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 04:21:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=Vz01Ktz04iJkxD8swgIhDQcAVAEDJAqO+FVTIkhj2jhvZpTRKj8buif3X14hBmz04 0BHgdpj37jgYHyLUZJbbg== Message-ID: <6599ad830706090120i6ba8686ep1abffd6cc4cd81e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:20:55 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3) Cc: "Balbir Singh" , "Linux Containers" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Pavel Emelianov" In-Reply-To: <20070609011740.fc938ed6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070608181346.15764.2467.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20070608124816.fa1e70d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6599ad830706090009q25e13ff6ybad7d7f7db21cd48@mail.gmail.com> <20070609010202.4c2b51fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6599ad830706090107u63b7e8c2p8e5c65778cde7473@mail.gmail.com> <20070609011740.fc938ed6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level > user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it? > Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it. Paul