From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935727AbXGTUay (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:30:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764841AbXGTUar (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:30:47 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:48568 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764244AbXGTUaq (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:30:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=L3qzFCkJxgfWM0gXZhVdg0HhxKE4FsfkNO/4fxiNHMo++FxZPItd6S0Fpag+Nr5Kh PkU7WnIfRSb+h4MevYYAQ== Message-ID: <6599ad830707201330t419458f2tba2d7a31d3b9701e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:30:26 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Balbir Singh" Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm PATCH 2/8] Memory controller containers setup (v3) Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Linux Containers" , "YAMAMOTO Takashi" , "Linux MM Mailing List" , "Vaidyanathan Srinivasan" , "Pavel Emelianov" , "Dave Hansen" , "Eric W Biederman" In-Reply-To: <20070720082416.20752.92946.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070720082352.20752.37209.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20070720082416.20752.92946.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/20/07, Balbir Singh wrote: > > +config CONTAINER_MEM_CONT > + bool "Memory controller for containers" > + select CONTAINERS Andrew asked me to not use "select" in Kconfig files due to some unspecified problems seen in the past, so my latest patchset makes the subsystems depend on containers rather than selecting them; I prefer the select approach over the dependency approach, but if select does have problems then we should be consistent. > +static struct cftype mem_container_usage = { > + .name = "mem_usage", > + .private = RES_USAGE, For V11, the .name field should just be called something like 'usage'; the subsystem name is automatically prefixed. > + > +static int mem_container_create(struct container_subsys *ss, > + struct container *cont) > +{ > + struct mem_container *mem; > + > + mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_container), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + res_counter_init(&mem->res); > + cont->subsys[mem_container_subsys_id] = &mem->css; > + mem->css.container = cont; > + return 0; For the V11 patchset, you'll want to replace these three lines with just return &mem->css; > +static int mem_container_populate(struct container_subsys *ss, > + struct container *cont) > +{ > + int rc = 0; > + > + rc = container_add_file(cont, &mem_container_usage); > + if (rc < 0) > + goto err; > + > + rc = container_add_file(cont, &mem_container_limit); > + if (rc < 0) > + goto err; > + > + rc = container_add_file(cont, &mem_container_failcnt); > + if (rc < 0) > + goto err; There's a container_add_files() API in V10 and above that lets you register an array of files in one go. > + > +err: > + return rc; > +} > + > +struct container_subsys mem_container_subsys = { > + .name = "mem_container", Maybe just "memory" or "pages" for the container name? Paul