From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751865AbXLAHsj (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 02:48:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751050AbXLAHsZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 02:48:25 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:20752 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751019AbXLAHsY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 02:48:24 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=oCENqDuCTv32I9a4oDzXTH1zA8ve3DomtNTRBs43CprySEMXDISxIfWcVEnq0WDYv mvL/sxays0j6CBTv+tD+Q== Message-ID: <6599ad830711302348n49900ca8jfa66fa71fde76a67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:48:15 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cpu accounting controller (V2) Cc: "Andrew Morton" , dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20071130124225.GM5681@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6599ad830711122125u576e85a6w428466a0ab46dbc6@mail.gmail.com> <20071113060038.GC3359@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830711122205g88aae4fua8dd76cf6e8ab84d@mail.gmail.com> <20071113074805.GA13499@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830711122357i60482475o10c0e0935a9e00c0@mail.gmail.com> <20071129191737.GH5681@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071129113035.bbdf35db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071129201833.GA18023@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071130124225.GM5681@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vatsa, Thanks, this looks pretty good. On Nov 30, 2007 4:42 AM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > - Removed load average information. I felt it needs more thought (esp > to deal with SMP and virtualized platforms) and can be added for > 2.6.25 after more discussions. The "load" value was never a load average, it was just a count of the % cpu time used in the previous fixed window of time, updated at the end of each window. Maybe we can instead do something based tracking the length of the run queue for the cgroup? Paul