From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764216AbYBTCwN (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:52:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758182AbYBTCvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:51:55 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:10057 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758451AbYBTCvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:51:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=hoEvk+F80KWj94LWfo8FYiwswF1XhY1pFGZgrj7jA1S+F/2B/q82qg1+jgYQd4iQl Hbs27uxUlG32+CE3tbmmQ== Message-ID: <6599ad830802191851ndfbc667oecb56492e87cd782@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:51:43 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Li Zefan" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] CGroup API: Add cgroup.api control file Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@in.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com, "Pavel Emelianov" , "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" , vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <47B953A8.9030206@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080215204418.535025000@menage.corp.google.com> <20080215204820.734926000@menage.corp.google.com> <47B6B5CA.7040201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830802160944v6d529570k1ade6df273ca3d0d@mail.gmail.com> <47B953A8.9030206@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb 18, 2008 1:45 AM, Li Zefan wrote: > > > > But we don't have /proc/proc.api or /sys/sysfs.api ... True. And /proc is a bit of a mess. Having a similar API file for sysfs sounds like a good idea to me. > > And is it better to describe the debug subsystem too? > Yes, probably, but that would be a separate patch to the debug subsystem itself, not the main cgroups code. Paul