From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763716AbYBTFYW (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:24:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758493AbYBTFXp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:23:45 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:15823 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757355AbYBTFXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:23:43 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=O6KXu9t7PmG7xWuwijsy/W2Qqqr8JL/w1sUwJkG3VU5w+uPjT//8gWsYVF461y0vo yVojf4Bf7aJIGuWHswx/Q== Message-ID: <6599ad830802192123m66c388f5v3916d979f320234e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:23:33 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Paul Jackson" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] CGroup API: Add cgroup.api control file Cc: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@in.ibm.com, xemul@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080219231726.4bd97520.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080215204418.535025000@menage.corp.google.com> <20080215204820.734926000@menage.corp.google.com> <47B6B5CA.7040201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830802160944v6d529570k1ade6df273ca3d0d@mail.gmail.com> <47B953A8.9030206@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080219155742.0298f25f.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830802191851l66281e67rb49c766c2b1427c9@mail.gmail.com> <20080219231726.4bd97520.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb 19, 2008 9:17 PM, Paul Jackson wrote: > > Perhaps my primary concern with these *.api files was that I did not > understand who or what the critical use or user was; who found this > essential, not just nice to have. > Right now, no-one would find it essential. If/when a binary API is added, I guess I'll ressurrect this part of the patchset. Paul