From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932171AbYCGM1S (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:27:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754445AbYCGM1E (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:27:04 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:9196 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752091AbYCGM1C (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:27:02 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=URDeFe8zhPRTa+mo50oflH5KuOcxEKuGfuWtMN3/m1Bo1vpBU50gOu3LG87Wq4sih LPtiIqe7VsvIsZPwvM3Eg== Message-ID: <6599ad830803070426l22d78446t588691dedeeb490b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 04:26:53 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Balbir Singh" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cgroup support for enabling controllers at boot time (v2) Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Pavel Emelianov" , "Hugh Dickins" , "Sudhir Kumar" , "YAMAMOTO Takashi" , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org, "David Rientjes" , "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" In-Reply-To: <6599ad830803070125o1ebfd7d1r728cdadf726ecbe2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080307085735.25567.314.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <6599ad830803070125o1ebfd7d1r728cdadf726ecbe2@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Paul Menage wrote: > > Doesn't this mean that cgroup_disable=cpu will disable whichever comes > first out of cpuset, cpuacct or cpu in the subsystem list? Or rather, it's the other way around - cgroup_disable=cpuset will instead disable the "cpu" subsystem if "cpu" comes before "cpuset" in the subsystem list. Paul