From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: "Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, pj@sgi.com, vegard.nossum@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] CGroups: Add a per-subsystem hierarchy lock
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:32:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830807101732w43e09514t281455861da53bad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486C59BE.3020400@qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> mkdir /dev/cpuset
> mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
> mkdir /dev/cpuset/0
> mkdir /dev/cpuset/1
> echo 0-2 > /dev/cpuset/0/cpuset.cpus
> echo 3 > /dev/cpuset/1/cpuset.cpus
> echo 0 > /dev/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
>
OK, I still can't reproduce this, on a 2-cpu system using one cpu for
each cpuset.
But the basic problem seemns to be that we have cpu_hotplug.lock taken
at the outer level (when offlining a CPU) and at the inner level (via
get_online_cpus() called from the guts of partition_sched_domains(),
if we didn't already take it at the outer level.
While looking at the code trying to figure out a nice way around this,
it struck me that we have the call path
cpuset_track_online_nodes() ->
common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() ->
scan_for_empty_cpusets() ->
access cpu_online_map with no calls to get_online_cpus()
Is that allowed? Maybe we need separate versions of
scan_for_empty_cpusets() that look at memory and cpus?
I think that we're going to want eventually a solution such pushing
the locking of cpuset_subsys.hierarchy_mutex down into the first part
of partition_sched_domains, that actually walks the cpuset tree
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 7:59 Paul Menage
2008-06-28 0:02 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-02 3:55 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 22:31 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-03 4:46 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-10 17:26 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 0:32 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2008-07-12 22:48 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830807101732w43e09514t281455861da53bad@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®