mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: "Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, pj@sgi.com, vegard.nossum@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] CGroups: Add a per-subsystem hierarchy lock
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:32:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830807101732w43e09514t281455861da53bad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486C59BE.3020400@qualcomm.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> mkdir /dev/cpuset
> mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
> mkdir /dev/cpuset/0
> mkdir /dev/cpuset/1
> echo 0-2 > /dev/cpuset/0/cpuset.cpus
> echo 3   > /dev/cpuset/1/cpuset.cpus
> echo 0 > /dev/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
>

OK, I still can't reproduce this, on a 2-cpu system using one cpu for
each cpuset.

But the basic problem seemns to be that we have cpu_hotplug.lock taken
at the outer level (when offlining a CPU) and at the inner level (via
get_online_cpus() called from the guts of partition_sched_domains(),
if we didn't already take it at the outer level.

While looking at the code trying to figure out a nice way around this,
it struck me that we have the call path

cpuset_track_online_nodes() ->
  common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() ->
    scan_for_empty_cpusets() ->
      access cpu_online_map with no calls to get_online_cpus()

Is that allowed? Maybe we need separate versions of
scan_for_empty_cpusets() that look at memory and cpus?

I think that we're going to want eventually a solution such pushing
the locking of cpuset_subsys.hierarchy_mutex down into the first part
of partition_sched_domains, that actually walks the cpuset tree

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-11  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-27  7:59 Paul Menage
2008-06-28  0:02 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-02  3:55   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 22:31     ` Paul Menage
2008-07-03  4:46       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-10 17:26         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11  0:32         ` Paul Menage [this message]
2008-07-12 22:48           ` Max Krasnyansky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6599ad830807101732w43e09514t281455861da53bad@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=menage@google.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®