mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Lai Jiangshan" <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroups: fix probable race with put_css_set[_taskexit] and find_css_set
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:31:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830809092231h90712a6mc95b81229d64d6bc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910050112.GA2897@kroah.com>

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> What are you trying to solve here with this change?  I agree, it does
> seem a bit "chaotic" :)

There's a place in cgroups that uses kref_put() to release an object;
the release function *then* takes a write-lock and removes the object
from a lookup table; it could race with another thread that searches
the lookup table (while holding a read-lock) and does kref_get() on
the same object.

The current fix is for the release function to recheck inside the lock
that the object's refcount is still zero, and only actually
unlink/free it if so. And actually I've just realised that this isn't
actually even safe, since the thread that just acquired the object
could kref_put() it almost immediately, which would leave two threads
both trying to unlink/free the object.

The two solutions being considered are:

- add a kref_put_and_write_lock(), similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(),
which would ensure that the final refcount on the object was only
released inside the lock

- add a kref_get_if_not_zero(), which would prevent a lookup from
succeeding if another thread had just dropped the last reference on
the object.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-10  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-19  6:29 Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-10  0:28 ` Paul Menage
2008-09-10  2:18   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-10  2:40     ` Li Zefan
2008-09-10  3:11     ` Paul Menage
2008-09-10  5:01     ` Greg KH
2008-09-10  5:31       ` Paul Menage [this message]
2008-09-10  6:17         ` Greg KH
2008-09-10  6:25           ` Li Zefan
2008-09-10  6:29             ` Greg KH
2008-09-10 15:03               ` Paul Menage
2008-09-12 15:58                 ` Greg KH
2008-09-12 19:33                   ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6599ad830809092231h90712a6mc95b81229d64d6bc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=menage@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®