mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPU hard limits
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:57:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830906050257q60e124dbt20dea7c6065f1edc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605095527.GM11755@balbir.in.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Balbir Singh<balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The point is that there is no single control entity for creating
> groups. if run a solution, it might create groups without telling the
> user. No one is arbitrating, not even libcgroup. What if someone
> changes the cpuset assignment and moves CPUS x to y in an exclusive
> cpuset all of a sudden. How do we arbitrate?

But in that situation, how do hard limits help? If you can't control
when cgroups are being created, and you can't control their shares,
how are you going to control their hard limits?

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04  5:36 Bharata B Rao
2009-06-04 12:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-04 21:32   ` Mike Waychison
2009-06-05  3:03   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  3:33     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  4:37       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  4:44         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  4:49           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:09             ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05  5:13               ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:10             ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:21               ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:27                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  5:31                   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  6:01                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  8:16                       ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-07  6:04                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07 16:14                           ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  9:39                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05 13:14                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:42                           ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-07  6:09                             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 14:54                           ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-07  6:10                             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  9:24                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  6:03                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  6:32                     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05 12:57                       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:16             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05  5:20               ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  3:07   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  8:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:27   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-06-05  9:32     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:48       ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05  9:51         ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:59           ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 10:03             ` Paul Menage
2009-06-08  8:50               ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-06-05  9:36   ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  9:48     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05  9:55       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-05  9:57         ` Paul Menage [this message]
2009-06-05 10:02         ` Paul Menage
2009-06-05 11:32   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-05 12:18     ` Paul Menage
2009-06-07 10:11       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-07 15:35         ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-08  4:37           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2009-06-05 14:44     ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05 13:02   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-05 13:43     ` Dhaval Giani
2009-06-05 14:45       ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-05  9:02 ` Reinhard Tartler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6599ad830906050257q60e124dbt20dea7c6065f1edc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=menage@google.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®