From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753130AbZHTDOD (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:14:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751347AbZHTDOD (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:14:03 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:18137 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbZHTDOB (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:14:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=fdhsjMsApYh7TzpNDU9l/O2D5+oD/OUB3foU8b6INeNSoLV3L1v6MXUGcqhyaKmDH spqTC/l9aXlJUG+Zeflzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A8CBEDC.6010709@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20090818235059.22531.42618.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> <20090818235812.22531.76212.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> <4A8CB62F.8030504@cn.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830908191941x6ee47d58x295c29f80f8c624c@mail.gmail.com> <4A8CBEDC.6010709@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:13:59 -0700 Message-ID: <6599ad830908192013p328a2256o8c807a160e25a9a3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Revert commit 8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869 From: Paul Menage To: Li Zefan Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bblum@andrew.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan wrote: > > As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func > names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring. > Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain. Paul