mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Berthier, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.berthier@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Jarzmik, Robert" <robert.jarzmik@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] [LBR] Dump LBRs on Exception
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:28:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65CD3FC07F3BF942ABE211646D72D770356EB330@IRSMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411271609510.3961@nanos>

> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:23 PM
> To: Berthier, Emmanuel
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin; x86@kernel.org; Jarzmik, Robert; LKML; Andy Lutomirski
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [LBR] Dump LBRs on Exception
> 
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Emmanuel Berthier wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> > index 45fa730..0a69365 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  #include <asm/msr.h>
> >  #include <asm/insn.h>
> > -
> 
> This newline is intentional to seperate asm includes from the local one.

Got it.

> >  static void __intel_pmu_lbr_enable(void)  {
> >  	u64 debugctl;
> >  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> >
> > +	lbr_set_used_by_perf(true);
> 
> This cannot work.
> 
> CPU0					CPU1
> 
> __intel_pmu_lbr_enable()
>    lbr_set_used_by_perf(true);
> 					__intel_pmu_lbr_disable()
> 					  lbr_set_used_by_perf(false);
> 
> This is a per cpu property.
> 
> And there is more to that. Let's look at a single CPU.
> 
> lbr for oops is enabled
> 
> context switch()
>    __intel_pmu_lbr_enable()	-> LBR used by perf, oops dumper disabled
> 
> context switch()
>    __intel_pmu_lbr_disable()	-> LBR not longer used by perf, oops
>    				   dumper enabled
> 
> So after that context switch we crash in the kernel and LBR is empty because
> we did disable it at the context switch.
> 
> So you need per cpu state, which handles the LBR dumper state:
> 
> #define LBR_OOPS_DISABLED 0x01
> #define LBR_PERF_USAGE	  0x02
> 
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, lbr_dump_state) = LBR_OOPS_DISABLED;
> 
> lbr_perf_enable()
> 	this_cpu_add(lbr_dump_state, LBR_PERF_USAGE);
> 
> lbr_perf_disable()
> 	if (!this_cpu_sub_return(lbr_dump_state, LBR_PERF_USAGE))
> 	   	enable_lbr_oops();
> 
> Now of course you need to handle this in the exception path per cpu as well.

Agree, I will do that.

Thx.
Emmanuel.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 17:03 [PATCH] [LBR] Dump LBRs on Oops Emmanuel Berthier
2014-11-22  0:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-26 10:56   ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-11-26 13:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-26 14:17       ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-11-26 14:46         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-26 15:43           ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-11-27 14:40             ` [PATCH v2] [LBR] Dump LBRs on Exception Emmanuel Berthier
2014-11-27 21:22               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-27 21:56                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-28  8:44                   ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-11-28 15:15                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-02 19:09                       ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-12-02 19:33                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-02 19:56                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-02 20:12                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-03 18:25                               ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-12-03 19:29                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-04 16:01                                   ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-12-04 18:09                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-05 13:14                                       ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-12-06 10:31                                       ` Robert Jarzmik
     [not found]                                         ` <CALCETrXhfzd9Fkikvm5qj0LWgWtDzgdpY_0EC3ChwyyGZksTMw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-07 18:40                                           ` Robert Jarzmik
2014-12-07 19:10                                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-12 17:30                                               ` Berthier, Emmanuel
2014-12-12 17:54                                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-28 10:28                 ` Berthier, Emmanuel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65CD3FC07F3BF942ABE211646D72D770356EB330@IRSMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=emmanuel.berthier@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®