mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, josef@toxicpanda.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:09:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <661dc6d6-2786-cbe5-e751-95947a1608cc@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413000649.115785-5-tj@kernel.org>

Hi,

在 2023/04/13 8:06, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Other rq_qos policies such as wbt and iocost are lazy-initialized when they
> are configured for the first time for the device but iolatency is
> initialized unconditionally from blkcg_init_disk() during gendisk init. Lazy
> init is beneficial because rq_qos policies add runtime overhead when
> initialized as every IO has to walk all registered rq_qos callbacks.
> 
> This patch switches iolatency to lazy initialization too so that it only
> registered its rq_qos policy when it is first configured.
> 
> Note that there is a known race condition between blkcg config file writes
> and del_gendisk() and this patch makes iolatency susceptible to it by
> exposing the init path to race against the deletion path. However, that
> problem already exists in iocost and is being worked on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-cgroup.c    |  8 --------
>   block/blk-iolatency.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   block/blk.h           |  6 ------
>   3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> index c154b08a7e92..1c1ebeb51003 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>   #include "blk-cgroup.h"
>   #include "blk-ioprio.h"
>   #include "blk-throttle.h"
> -#include "blk-rq-qos.h"
>   
>   /*
>    * blkcg_pol_mutex protects blkcg_policy[] and policy [de]activation.
> @@ -1350,14 +1349,8 @@ int blkcg_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto err_ioprio_exit;
>   
> -	ret = blk_iolatency_init(disk);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err_throtl_exit;
> -
>   	return 0;
>   
> -err_throtl_exit:
> -	blk_throtl_exit(disk);
>   err_ioprio_exit:
>   	blk_ioprio_exit(disk);
>   err_destroy_all:
> @@ -1373,7 +1366,6 @@ int blkcg_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   void blkcg_exit_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   {
>   	blkg_destroy_all(disk);
> -	rq_qos_exit(disk->queue);
>   	blk_throtl_exit(disk);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> index 2560708b9109..fd5fec989e39 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static void blkiolatency_enable_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -int blk_iolatency_init(struct gendisk *disk)
> +static int blk_iolatency_init(struct gendisk *disk)
>   {
>   	struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -824,6 +824,29 @@ static void iolatency_clear_scaling(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static int blk_iolatency_try_init(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	static DEFINE_MUTEX(init_mutex);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = blkg_conf_open_bdev(ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * blk_iolatency_init() may fail after rq_qos_add() succeeds which can
> +	 * confuse iolat_rq_qos() test. Make the test and init atomic.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&init_mutex);

Can we just convert the return value from -EBUSY to 0 in this case, so
that the global lock won't be needed.

Thanks,
Kuai
> +
> +	if (!iolat_rq_qos(ctx->bdev->bd_queue))
> +		ret = blk_iolatency_init(ctx->bdev->bd_disk);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&init_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>   			     size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
>   {
> @@ -838,6 +861,10 @@ static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>   
>   	blkg_conf_init(&ctx, buf);
>   
> +	ret = blk_iolatency_try_init(&ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
>   	ret = blkg_conf_prep(blkcg, &blkcg_policy_iolatency, &ctx);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out;
> diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
> index d65d96994a94..62fca868bc61 100644
> --- a/block/blk.h
> +++ b/block/blk.h
> @@ -399,12 +399,6 @@ static inline struct bio *blk_queue_bounce(struct bio *bio,
>   	return bio;
>   }
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOLATENCY
> -int blk_iolatency_init(struct gendisk *disk);
> -#else
> -static inline int blk_iolatency_init(struct gendisk *disk) { return 0; };
> -#endif
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>   void disk_free_zone_bitmaps(struct gendisk *disk);
>   void disk_clear_zone_settings(struct gendisk *disk);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13  0:06 [PATCHSET v4 block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  0:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish() Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  4:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-13  0:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] blkcg: Restructure blkg_conf_prep() and friends Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  5:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-13  0:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-iolatency: s/blkcg_rq_qos/iolat_rq_qos/ Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  0:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  2:09   ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2023-04-13  5:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-13 12:47 ` [PATCHSET v4 block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-10 22:27 [PATCHSET v3 " Tejun Heo
2023-01-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-05 21:24 [PATCHSET v2 block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-05 21:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-10  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-05  0:20 [PATCHSET block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-05  0:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=661dc6d6-2786-cbe5-e751-95947a1608cc@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®