mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Balbir Singh" <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin Peschke" <mp3@de.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:32:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <661de9470605191202p5b46312bya129d59ea06041bf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661de9470605191159n75578d60qd1f3309e3a7e2234@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/20/06, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> >  Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > My patch series is a proposal for a generic implementation of statistics.
> >
> > This uses debugfs for the user interface, but the
> > per-task-delay-accounting-*.patch series from Balbir creates an extensible
> > netlink-based system for passing instrumentation results back to userspace.
> >
> > Can this code be converted to use those netlink interfaces, or is Balbir's
> > approach unsuitable, or hasn't it even been considered, or what?
> >
> >
>
Hi, Martin/Andrew,

I am resending this email, my mailer got crazy and sent out HTML (sorry!)

I have seen the patches around, but I've had no time to review them. I
was planning to do so this weekend.

The main difference I see, like you pointed out is the netlink
interface vs debugfs. I think the netlink approach is more suitable
(there is no need to mount a filesystem and create files followed by
frequent open/read/close operations). Just one netlink socket should
do the trick. The event subscription mechanism in netlink is very
useful as well.

Martin, could you please take a look at the taskstats interface and
see if it is possible to make use of them?

Thanks,
Balbir

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-19 16:07 Martin Peschke
2006-05-19 16:24 ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]   ` <661de9470605191159n75578d60qd1f3309e3a7e2234@mail.gmail.com>
2006-05-19 19:02     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-05-19 23:03   ` Martin Peschke
2006-05-21 11:29     ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:09   ` netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure) Tim Bird
2006-05-22 18:34     ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:53       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-23 16:59   ` [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure Martin Peschke
2006-05-23 21:42     ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-24  3:12       ` Balbir Singh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-24 12:27 Martin Peschke
2006-05-23 20:42 Al Boldi
2005-12-14 16:13 [patch " Martin Peschke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=661de9470605191202p5b46312bya129d59ea06041bf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mp3@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®