From: "Balbir Singh" <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin Peschke" <mp3@de.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:32:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <661de9470605191202p5b46312bya129d59ea06041bf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661de9470605191159n75578d60qd1f3309e3a7e2234@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/20/06, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> > Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > My patch series is a proposal for a generic implementation of statistics.
> >
> > This uses debugfs for the user interface, but the
> > per-task-delay-accounting-*.patch series from Balbir creates an extensible
> > netlink-based system for passing instrumentation results back to userspace.
> >
> > Can this code be converted to use those netlink interfaces, or is Balbir's
> > approach unsuitable, or hasn't it even been considered, or what?
> >
> >
>
Hi, Martin/Andrew,
I am resending this email, my mailer got crazy and sent out HTML (sorry!)
I have seen the patches around, but I've had no time to review them. I
was planning to do so this weekend.
The main difference I see, like you pointed out is the netlink
interface vs debugfs. I think the netlink approach is more suitable
(there is no need to mount a filesystem and create files followed by
frequent open/read/close operations). Just one netlink socket should
do the trick. The event subscription mechanism in netlink is very
useful as well.
Martin, could you please take a look at the taskstats interface and
see if it is possible to make use of them?
Thanks,
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-19 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-19 16:07 Martin Peschke
2006-05-19 16:24 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <661de9470605191159n75578d60qd1f3309e3a7e2234@mail.gmail.com>
2006-05-19 19:02 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-05-19 23:03 ` Martin Peschke
2006-05-21 11:29 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:09 ` netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure) Tim Bird
2006-05-22 18:34 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:53 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-23 16:59 ` [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure Martin Peschke
2006-05-23 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-24 3:12 ` Balbir Singh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-24 12:27 Martin Peschke
2006-05-23 20:42 Al Boldi
2005-12-14 16:13 [patch " Martin Peschke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=661de9470605191202p5b46312bya129d59ea06041bf@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mp3@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®