From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760460AbXGJIl3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:41:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756184AbXGJIlU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:41:20 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]:5756 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755670AbXGJIlT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:41:19 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=U+7QodlsMATlUD5z3Rj86YanyfpNAaeDs9Hu6vpIJWcBEne9ELyaFMpZRjC4u2GR+Gs5f+Phhv4IGGfp069cbR7CzlK+3H4xj536YeAEbVAmhhj9T3Td5z2uwOPugjPtw0Wnv1RTpJotDxyhOeLmm1A1WcJ180S6xWA9RrL+DfM= Message-ID: <661de9470707100141h779e75eev9c09fdb2dfd09b8b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:11:18 +0530 From: "Balbir Singh" To: "YAMAMOTO Takashi" Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH 4/8] Memory controller memory accounting (v2) Cc: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, menage@google.com In-Reply-To: <20070710072651.C061D1BF77E@siro.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070706052135.11677.28030.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <20070710072651.C061D1BF77E@siro.lan> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5238e669fdc3a50a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/10/07, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > hi, > > > diff -puN mm/memory.c~mem-control-accounting mm/memory.c > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc6/mm/memory.c~mem-control-accounting 2007-07-05 13:45:18.000000000 -0700 > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-balbir/mm/memory.c 2007-07-05 13:45:18.000000000 -0700 > > > @@ -1731,6 +1736,9 @@ gotten: > > cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, address, vma); > > } > > > > + if (mem_container_charge(new_page, mm)) > > + goto oom; > > + > > /* > > * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock > > */ > > it seems that the page will be leaked on error. You mean meta_page right? > > > @@ -2188,6 +2196,11 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct > > } > > > > delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN); > > + if (mem_container_charge(page, mm)) { > > + ret = VM_FAULT_OOM; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > mark_page_accessed(page); > > lock_page(page); > > > > ditto. > > > @@ -2264,6 +2278,9 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_s > > if (!page) > > goto oom; > > > > + if (mem_container_charge(page, mm)) > > + goto oom; > > + > > entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot); > > entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma); > > > > ditto. > > can you check the rest of the patch by yourself? thanks. > Excellent catch! I'll review the accounting framework and post the updated version soon Balbir