From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sysfs: Allow bin_attributes to be added to groups
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:40:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <662be72549aaf_db82d294c7@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e140f6bf8dc99c24cc387f7ac3c7908c8830587f.1714030457.git.lukas@wunner.de>
Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Commit dfa87c824a9a ("sysfs: allow attributes to be added to groups")
> introduced dynamic addition of sysfs attributes to groups.
>
> Allow the same for bin_attributes, in support of a forthcoming commit
> which adds various bin_attributes every time a PCI device is
> authenticated.
>
> Addition of bin_attributes to groups differs from regular attributes in
> that different kernfs_ops are selected by sysfs_add_bin_file_mode_ns()
> vis-à-vis sysfs_add_file_mode_ns().
>
> So call either of those two functions from sysfs_add_file_to_group()
> based on an additional boolean parameter and add two wrapper functions,
> one for bin_attributes and another for regular attributes.
>
> Removal of bin_attributes from groups does not require a differentiation
> for bin_attributes and can use the same code path as regular attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> ---
> Submitting this ahead of my PCI device authentication v2 patches.
> Not sure if the patch is acceptable without an accompanying user,
> but even if it's not, perhaps someone has early review feedback
> or wants to provide an Acked-by? Thank you!
On the one hand it makes sense from a symmetry perspective, on the other
hand the expectation and the infrastructure for dynamic sysfs visibilty
has increased since 2007.
That is why I would like to see the use case to understand why a
dynamically added a bin_attribute is needed compared with a statically
defined attribute with dynamic visibility.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 7:44 Lukas Wunner
2024-04-26 17:40 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-04-26 18:59 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-27 10:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-27 16:32 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=662be72549aaf_db82d294c7@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®