From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks()
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:42:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66311f5c59e15_10c212947f@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240430092200.2335887-2-rrichter@amd.com>
Robert Richter wrote:
> For configurations that have the kconfig option NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO
> disabled numa_fill_memblks() only returns with NUMA_NO_MEMBLK (-1).
> SRAT lookup fails then because an existing SRAT memory range cannot be
> found for a CFMWS address range. This causes the addition of a
> duplicate numa_memblk with a different node id and a subsequent page
> fault and kernel crash during boot.
>
> Fix this by making numa_fill_memblks() always available regardless of
> NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO.
>
> The fix also removes numa_fill_memblks() from sparsemem.h using
> __weak.
>
> From Dan:
>
> """
> It just feels like numa_fill_memblks() has absolutely no business being
> defined in arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h.
>
> The only use for numa_fill_memblks() is to arrange for NUMA nodes to be
> applied to memory ranges hot-onlined by the CXL driver.
>
> It belongs right next to numa_add_memblk(), and I suspect
> arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h was only chosen to avoid figuring out
> what to do about the fact that linux/numa.h does not include asm/numa.h
> and that all implementations either provide numa_add_memblk() or select
> the generic implementation.
>
> So I would prefer that this do the proper fix and get
> numa_fill_memblks() completely out of the sparsemem.h path.
>
> Something like the following which boots for me.
> """
>
> Note that the issue was initially introduced with [1]. But since
> phys_to_target_node() was originally used that returned the valid node
> 0, an additional numa_memblk was not added. Though, the node id was
> wrong too, a message is seen then in the logs:
>
> kernel/numa.c: pr_info_once("Unknown target node for memory at 0x%llx, assuming node 0\n",
>
> [1] commit fd49f99c1809 ("ACPI: NUMA: Add a node and memblk for each
> CFMWS not in SRAT")
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66271b0072317_69102944c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
> Fixes: 8f1004679987 ("ACPI/NUMA: Apply SRAT proximity domain to entire CFMWS window")
> Cc: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 9:21 [PATCH v6 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates Robert Richter
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-02 11:59 ` Robert Richter
2024-05-02 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:16 ` Alison Schofield
2024-05-02 12:11 ` Robert Richter
2024-04-30 16:42 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] ACPI/NUMA: Remove architecture dependent remainings Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_slit_init() into acpi_parse_slit() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() into acpi_parse_memory_affinity() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 16:01 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 15:49 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 17:05 ` Dan Williams
2024-05-02 12:45 ` Robert Richter
2024-04-30 9:21 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges found in CEDT Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-30 15:49 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 17:14 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-30 9:22 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT) Robert Richter
2024-04-30 15:55 ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-30 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-02 12:53 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66311f5c59e15_10c212947f@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=derick.w.marks@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®