From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: srivasam@codeaurora.org, rafael@kernel.org,
dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: move readable check before accessing regcache.
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <666da41f-173e-152d-84e5-e9b32baa60da@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618115104.GB4920@sirena.org.uk>
Thanks Mark for review,
On 18/06/2021 12:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:35:58PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>> The issue that I encountered is when doing regmap_update_bits on
>> a write only register. In regcache path this will not do the right
>> thing as the register is not readable and driver which is using
>> regmap_update_bits will never notice that it can not do a update
>> bits on write only register leading to inconsistent writes and
>> random hardware behavior.
>
> Why will use of regmap_update_bits() mean that a driver will never
> notice a write failure? Shouldn't remgap_update_bits() be fixed to
> report any errors it isn't reporting, or the driver fixed to check
usecase is performing regmap_update_bits() on a *write-only* registers.
_regmap_update_bits() checks _regmap_read() return value before bailing
out. In non cache path we have this regmap_readable() check however in
cached patch we do not have this check, so _regmap_read() will return
success in this case so regmap_update_bits() never reports any error.
driver in question does check the return value.
> error codes? I really don't understand the issue you're trying to
> report - what is "the right thing" and what makes you believe that a
> driver can't do an _update_bits() on a write only but cached register?
> Can you specify in concrete terms what the problem is.
So one of recent patch ("ASoC: qcom: Fix for DMA interrupt clear reg
overwriting)
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20210618&id=da0363f7bfd3c32f8d5918e40bfddb9905c86ee1
broke audio on DragonBoard 410c.
This patch simply converts writes to regmap_update_bits for that
particular dma channel. The register that its updating is IRQ_CLEAR
register which is software "WRITE-ONLY" and Hardware read-only register.
The bits in particular case is updating is a period interrupt clear bit.
Because we are using regmap cache in this driver,
first regmap_update_bits(map, 0x1, 0x1) on first period interrupt will
update the cache and write to IRQ_CLEAR hardware register which then
clears the interrupt latch.
On second period interrupt we do regmap_update_bits(map, 0x1, 0x1) with
the same bits, Because we are using cache for this regmap caches sees no
change in the cache value vs the new value so it will never write/update
IRQ_CLEAR hardware register, so hardware is stuck here waiting for
IRQ_CLEAR write from driver and audio keeps repeating the last period.
>
>> There seems to be missing checks in regcache_read() which is
>> now added by moving the orignal check in _regmap_read() before
>> accessing regcache.
>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 5d1729e7f02f ("regmap: Incorporate the regcache core into regmap")
>
> Are you *sure* you've identified the actual issue here - nobody has seen
I think so, my above triage does summarizes the problem in detail.
> any problems with this in the past decade? Please don't just pick a
> random commit for the sake of adding a Fixes tag.
I did git blame and picked up this changeset which is when the cache was
integrated.
>
>> @@ -2677,6 +2677,9 @@ static int _regmap_read(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
>> int ret;
>> void *context = _regmap_map_get_context(map);
>>
>> + if (!regmap_readable(map, reg))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> if (!map->cache_bypass) {
>> ret = regcache_read(map, reg, val);
>> if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -2686,9 +2689,6 @@ static int _regmap_read(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
>> if (map->cache_only)
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> - if (!regmap_readable(map, reg))
>> - return -EIO;
>> -
>
> This puts the readability check before the cache check which will break
> all drivers using the cache on write only registers.
Initially I added check in regcache_read(), later I moved it to
_regmap_read. do you think check in regcache_read() is the correct place?
--srini
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 11:35 Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-06-18 11:51 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-18 12:29 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2021-06-18 15:48 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-21 10:30 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-06-21 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-21 12:43 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=666da41f-173e-152d-84e5-e9b32baa60da@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=srivasam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®