From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, hpa@zytor.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: Enable CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM on all architectures
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 14:13:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <666e012e-0b13-4def-82de-55ccd5868d36@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <044e3f9a-3de2-4939-afff-3bb527eb024b@bytedance.com>
On 03/11/25 12:33 pm, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Hi Dev,
>
> On 11/3/25 2:37 PM, Dev Jain wrote:
>> The implementation of CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM is completely contained in
>> generic
>> mm code. It depends on the RCU callback which will reclaim the
>> pagetables -
>> there is nothing arch-specific about that. So, enable this config for
>> all architectures.
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> But unfortunately, not all architectures call tlb_remove_ptdesc() in
> __pte_free_tlb(). Some architectures directly call pte_free() to
> free PTE pages (without RCU).
Thanks! This was not obvious to figure out.
Is there an arch bottleneck because of which they do this? I mean to say,
is something stopping us from simply redirecting __pte_free_tlb to
tlb_remove_ptdesc
or pte_free_defer?
I am looking to enable this config at least on arm64 by default, I
believe it will be legal
to do this at least here.
>
> We need to modify these architectures first, otherwise it will
> lead to UAF. This approach is feasible because Hugh provides similar
> support in pte_free_defer().
>
> Enabling PT_RECLAIM on all architecture has always been on my
> TODO list, but it's been blocked by other things. :(
>
> Thanks,
> Qi
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
>> mm/Kconfig | 5 +----
>> mm/pt_reclaim.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index fa3b616af03a..5681308a5650 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ config X86
>> select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
>> imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT if EFI
>> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
>> - select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM if X86_64
>> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if SMP
>> select SCHED_SMT if SMP
>> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER if SMP
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 0e26f4fc8717..903c37d02555 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1355,13 +1355,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>> The architecture has hardware support for userspace shadow call
>> stacks (eg, x86 CET, arm64 GCS or RISC-V Zicfiss).
>> -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM
>> - def_bool n
>> -
>> config PT_RECLAIM
>> bool "reclaim empty user page table pages"
>> default y
>> - depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM && MMU && SMP
>> + depends on MMU && SMP
>> select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>> help
>> Try to reclaim empty user page table pages in paths other
>> than munmap
>> diff --git a/mm/pt_reclaim.c b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> index 7e9455a18aae..049e17f08c6a 100644
>> --- a/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> +++ b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>> -#include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
>> +#include <asm/tlb.h>
>> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> #include "internal.h"
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 6:37 Dev Jain
2025-11-03 7:03 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-03 8:43 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-11-03 9:07 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-04 4:02 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-04 6:33 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-04 13:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-11-04 13:21 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-04 13:15 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=666e012e-0b13-4def-82de-55ccd5868d36@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®