mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, hpa@zytor.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: Enable CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM on all architectures
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 14:13:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <666e012e-0b13-4def-82de-55ccd5868d36@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <044e3f9a-3de2-4939-afff-3bb527eb024b@bytedance.com>


On 03/11/25 12:33 pm, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Hi Dev,
>
> On 11/3/25 2:37 PM, Dev Jain wrote:
>> The implementation of CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM is completely contained in 
>> generic
>> mm code. It depends on the RCU callback which will reclaim the 
>> pagetables -
>> there is nothing arch-specific about that. So, enable this config for
>> all architectures.
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> But unfortunately, not all architectures call tlb_remove_ptdesc() in
> __pte_free_tlb(). Some architectures directly call pte_free() to
> free PTE pages (without RCU).

Thanks! This was not obvious to figure out.

Is there an arch bottleneck because of which they do this? I mean to say,

is something stopping us from simply redirecting __pte_free_tlb to 
tlb_remove_ptdesc

or pte_free_defer?


I am looking to enable this config at least on arm64 by default, I 
believe it will be legal

to do this at least here.


>
> We need to modify these architectures first, otherwise it will
> lead to UAF. This approach is feasible because Hugh provides similar
> support in pte_free_defer().
>
> Enabling PT_RECLAIM on all architecture has always been on my
> TODO list, but it's been blocked by other things. :(
>
> Thanks,
> Qi
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
>>   mm/Kconfig       | 5 +----
>>   mm/pt_reclaim.c  | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index fa3b616af03a..5681308a5650 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ config X86
>>       select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
>>       imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT    if EFI
>>       select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
>> -    select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM        if X86_64
>>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT        if SMP
>>       select SCHED_SMT            if SMP
>>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER    if SMP
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 0e26f4fc8717..903c37d02555 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1355,13 +1355,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>>         The architecture has hardware support for userspace shadow call
>>             stacks (eg, x86 CET, arm64 GCS or RISC-V Zicfiss).
>>   -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM
>> -    def_bool n
>> -
>>   config PT_RECLAIM
>>       bool "reclaim empty user page table pages"
>>       default y
>> -    depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM && MMU && SMP
>> +    depends on MMU && SMP
>>       select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>>       help
>>         Try to reclaim empty user page table pages in paths other 
>> than munmap
>> diff --git a/mm/pt_reclaim.c b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> index 7e9455a18aae..049e17f08c6a 100644
>> --- a/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> +++ b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>   #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>> -#include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
>> +#include <asm/tlb.h>
>>   #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>>     #include "internal.h"
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03  6:37 Dev Jain
2025-11-03  7:03 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-03  8:43   ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-11-03  9:07     ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-04  4:02       ` Dev Jain
2025-11-04  6:33         ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-04 13:13           ` Lance Yang
2025-11-04 13:21             ` Dev Jain
2025-11-04 13:15           ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=666e012e-0b13-4def-82de-55ccd5868d36@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®