From: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<vschneid@redhat.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<bristot@redhat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Question] The system may be stuck if there is a cpu cgroup cpu.cfs_quato_us is very low
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 14:59:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66a1d60d-b6a7-7d7e-6c70-e75456bc828c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yr9V755mL6jr20c2@mtj.duckdns.org>
在 2022/7/2 4:15, Tejun Heo 写道:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 01:08:21PM -0700, Benjamin Segall wrote:
>> Yes, fixing (kernel) priority inversion due to CFS_BANDWIDTH requires a
>> serious reworking of how it works, because it would need to dequeue
>> tasks individually rather than doing the entire cfs_rq at a time (and
>> would require some effort to avoid pinging every throttling task to get
>> it into the kernel).
>
> Right, I don't have a good idea on evolving the current implementation
> into something correct. As you pointed out, we need to account along
> the sched_group tree but conditionally enforce on each thread.
>
> Thanks.
>
Understood. Thanks for your detailed explanation.
Thanks.
--
Qiao
.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-27 6:50 Zhang Qiao
2022-06-27 8:32 ` Tejun Heo
2022-07-01 7:34 ` Zhang Qiao
2022-07-01 20:08 ` Benjamin Segall
2022-07-01 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2022-07-07 6:59 ` Zhang Qiao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66a1d60d-b6a7-7d7e-6c70-e75456bc828c@huawei.com \
--to=zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®