mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Kunwu Chan" <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
	"Anna-Maria Gleixner" <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rwonce: Add READ_ONCE_THIS_CPU() and WRITE_ONCE_THIS_CPU()
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:50:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66d8d340-ff50-4fcb-bf19-05fa68c27238@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007022859.60101-2-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 7, 2026, at 04:28, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> Per-CPU variables are sometimes accessed from different execution
> contexts on the same CPU, typically task context and an interrupt or
> NMI handler.
>
> A plain READ_ONCE() or WRITE_ONCE() marks such an access as an
> intentional race but does not express where the racing accesses are
> expected to come from. This distinction allows concurrency tools such
> as KCSAN to tell an intentional same-CPU context race apart from an
> access that may race across CPUs.
>
> Add READ_ONCE_THIS_CPU() and WRITE_ONCE_THIS_CPU() to identify accesses
> to a per-CPU variable which are intended to race only with accesses
> from other execution contexts on the same CPU. For now, they are
> simple wrappers around READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), so generated code
> and tool behaviour are unchanged.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>

No objections here, but since I missed the background, I don't
see what a future implementation of the new macros might do
that is different from the existing macros, maybe you can still
clarify that.

For taking this through something other than my asm-generic tree:

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07  2:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] rwonce: Introduce {READ,WRITE}_ONCE_THIS_CPU() Kunwu Chan
2026-10-07  2:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rwonce: Add READ_ONCE_THIS_CPU() and WRITE_ONCE_THIS_CPU() Kunwu Chan
2026-10-07 10:50   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-10-08  5:56     ` KunWu Chan
2026-10-07  2:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] timers/nohz: Mark got_idle_tick accesses as same-CPU races Kunwu Chan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66d8d340-ff50-4fcb-bf19-05fa68c27238@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®