mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
	David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:15:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67168c64-25f2-6efd-c743-9bc459ff87d2@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220908161516.4361-4-logang@deltatee.com>


Hi Song,

On 2022-09-08 10:15, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> A complicated deadlock exists when using the journal and an elevated
> group_thrtead_cnt. It was found with loop devices, but its not clear
> whether it can be seen with real disks. The deadlock can occur simply
> by writing data with an fio script.
> 
> When the deadlock occurs, multiple threads will hang in different ways:
> 
>  1) The group threads will hang in the blk-wbt code with bios waiting to
>     be submitted to the block layer:
> 
>         io_schedule+0x70/0xb0
>         rq_qos_wait+0x153/0x210
>         wbt_wait+0x115/0x1b0
>         io_schedule+0x70/0xb0
>         rq_qos_wait+0x153/0x210
>         wbt_wait+0x115/0x1b0
>         __rq_qos_throttle+0x38/0x60
>         blk_mq_submit_bio+0x589/0xcd0
>         wbt_wait+0x115/0x1b0
>         __rq_qos_throttle+0x38/0x60
>         blk_mq_submit_bio+0x589/0xcd0
>         __submit_bio+0xe6/0x100
>         submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x42e/0x470
>         submit_bio_noacct+0x4c2/0xbb0
>         ops_run_io+0x46b/0x1a30
>         handle_stripe+0xcd3/0x36b0
>         handle_active_stripes.constprop.0+0x6f6/0xa60
>         raid5_do_work+0x177/0x330
> 
>     Or:
>         io_schedule+0x70/0xb0
>         rq_qos_wait+0x153/0x210
>         wbt_wait+0x115/0x1b0
>         __rq_qos_throttle+0x38/0x60
>         blk_mq_submit_bio+0x589/0xcd0
>         __submit_bio+0xe6/0x100
>         submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x42e/0x470
>         submit_bio_noacct+0x4c2/0xbb0
>         flush_deferred_bios+0x136/0x170
>         raid5_do_work+0x262/0x330
> 
>  2) The r5l_reclaim thread will hang in the same way, submitting a
>     bio to the block layer:
> 
>         io_schedule+0x70/0xb0
>         rq_qos_wait+0x153/0x210
>         wbt_wait+0x115/0x1b0
>         __rq_qos_throttle+0x38/0x60
>         blk_mq_submit_bio+0x589/0xcd0
>         __submit_bio+0xe6/0x100
>         submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x42e/0x470
>         submit_bio_noacct+0x4c2/0xbb0
>         submit_bio+0x3f/0xf0
>         md_super_write+0x12f/0x1b0
>         md_update_sb.part.0+0x7c6/0xff0
>         md_update_sb+0x30/0x60
>         r5l_do_reclaim+0x4f9/0x5e0
>         r5l_reclaim_thread+0x69/0x30b
> 
>     However, before hanging, the MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING flag will be
>     set for sb_flags in r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(). This
>     flag will never be cleared because the submit_bio() call never
>     returns.
> 
>  3) Due to the MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING flag being set, handle_stripe()
>     will do no processing on any pending stripes and re-set
>     STRIPE_HANDLE. This will cause the raid5d thread to enter an
>     infinite loop, constantly trying to handle the same stripes
>     stuck in the queue.
> 
>     The raid5d thread has a blk_plug that holds a number of bios
>     that are also stuck waiting seeing the thread is in a loop
>     that never schedules. These bios have been accounted for by
>     blk-wbt thus preventing the other threads above from
>     continuing when they try to submit bios. --Deadlock.
> 
> To fix this, add the same wait_event() that is used in raid5_do_work()
> to raid5d() such that if MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING is set, the thread will
> schedule and wait until the flag is cleared. The schedule action will
> flush the plug which will allow the r5l_reclaim thread to continue,
> thus preventing the deadlock.
> 
> It's not clear when the deadlock was introduced, but the similar
> wait_event() call in raid5_do_work() was added in 2017 by this
> commit:
> 
>     16d997b78b15 ("md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata
>                    is updated.")
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7f3b87b6-b52a-f737-51d7-a4eec5c44112@deltatee.com
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>

Seems this patch of mine that is in md-next is causing an 1 in ~30
failure on the mdadm test 13imsm-r0_r5_3d-grow-r0_r5_4d.

I'm looking into it and will try to send an updated patch when I have a fix.

Logan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-15 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08 16:15 [PATCH v2 0/3] A couple more bug fixes Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-08 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] md/raid5: Remove unnecessary bio_put() in raid5_read_one_chunk() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-08 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] md: Remove extra mddev_get() in md_seq_start() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-09  4:53   ` Paul Menzel
2022-09-08 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-15 15:15   ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-09-19 18:31     ` Song Liu
2022-09-09 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A couple more bug fixes Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67168c64-25f2-6efd-c743-9bc459ff87d2@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=David.Sloan@eideticom.com \
    --cc=Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®