From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: fix potential races when walking host page table
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:45:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67222fe0-7bf0-ec7a-0791-a4d48391a15e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ymv3vwBEgCH0CMPH@google.com>
On 4/29/22 16:35, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> +out:
>>> + local_irq_restore(flags);
>>> + return level;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lookup_address_level_in_mm);
>>
>> Exporting is not needed.
>>
>> Thanks for writing the walk code though. I'll adapt it and integrate the
>> patch.
>
> But why are we fixing this only in KVM? I liked the idea of stealing perf's
> implementation because it was a seemlingly perfect fit and wouldn't introduce
> new code (ignoring wrappers, etc...).
>
> We _know_ that at least one subsystem is misusing lookup_address_in_pgd() and
> given that its wrappers are exported, I highly doubt KVM is the only offender.
> It really feels like we're passing the buck here by burying the fix in KVM.
There are two ways to do it:
* having a generic function in mm/. The main issue there is the lack of
a PG_LEVEL_{P4D,PUD,PMD,PTE} enum at the mm/ level. We could use
(ctz(x) - 12) / 9 to go from size to level, but it's ugly and there
could be architectures with heterogeneous page table sizes.
* having a generic function in arch/x86/. In this case KVM seems to be
the odd one that doesn't need the PTE. For example vc_slow_virt_to_phys
needs the PTE, and needs the size rather than the "level" per se.
So for now I punted, while keeping open the door for moving code from
arch/x86/kvm/ to mm/ if anyone else (even other KVM ports) need the same
logic.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 3:17 Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-29 9:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-29 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-29 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67222fe0-7bf0-ec7a-0791-a4d48391a15e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®