From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751790AbeCLOPy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:15:54 -0400 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.132]:50602 "EHLO out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbeCLOPx (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:15:53 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R281e4;CH=green;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01353;MF=zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=2;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0SzHkA5D_1520864148; Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] modsign enhancement To: Jessica Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1520483223-6596-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com> <20180312132823.dixp7gkjypjlgymt@redbean.localdomain> From: Jia Zhang Message-ID: <6727b467-e2fe-4981-fe77-b9ec3ebf8818@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:15:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180312132823.dixp7gkjypjlgymt@redbean.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/3/12 下午9:28, Jessica Yu wrote: > +++ Jia Zhang [08/03/18 12:26 +0800]: >> This patch series allows to disable module validity enforcement >> in runtime through /sys/kernel/security/modsign/enforce interface. >> >> Assuming CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE=y, here are the instructions to >> disable the validity enforcement. >> >> # cat /sys/kernel/security/modsign/enforce >> # echo -n 0 > data >> # openssl smime -sign -nocerts -noattr -binary -in data \ >>    -inkey -signer -outform der \ >>    -out /sys/kernel/security/modsign/enforce >> >> Now enable enforcement again on demand. >> >> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/security/modsign/enforce >> >> Changelog: >> v2: >> - Support to disable validity enforcement in runtime. > > NAK - please use /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce. > > And I would rather keep this parameter bool_enable_only, plain and simple. > What use case do you have/why would you want to disable signature > enforcement - after having enabled it - during runtime?  None of this > is explained nor justified in the cover letter. Because there is no way to disable it such as module.no_sig_enforce when MODULE_SIG_FORCE=y available unless re-compiling a kernel without this enforcement. This is inconvenient a bit. IMA and SELinux both have cmdline control, but modsign doesn't have. Even we really have a module.no_sig_enforce in cmdline, runtime disablement can be used to avoid machine reboot. Sometimes machine reboot is expensive. If you agree, I can implement the runtime disablement via /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce. Additionally, supporting module.no_sig_enforce when MODULE_SIG_FORCE=y is another one to be implemented. Thanks, Jia > > Thanks, > > Jessica