From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: 2.5.61 oops running SDET
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:09:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67320000.1045361394@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302151723560.23951-100000@home.transmeta.com>
> Yeah, but I think the bug has existed for much longer.
>
> It looks like "proc_pid_status()" doesn't actually lock the task at all,
> nor even bother to test whether the task has signal state. Which has
> _always_ been a bug. I don't know why it would start happening now, but
> it might just be unlucky timing.
>
> I think the proper fix is to put a
>
> task_lock()
> ..
> task_unlock()
>
> around the whole proc_pid_status() function, _and_ then verify that
> "tsk->sighand" is non-NULL.
>
> (Oh, careful, that's already what "get_task_mm()" does internally, so
> look out for deadlocks - you'd need to open-code the get_task_mm() in
> there too, so the end result is something like
>
> task_lock(task)
> if (task->mm) {
> .. mm state
> }
> if (task->sighand) {
> .. signal state
> }
> ..
> task_unlock(task);
>
> instead).
Something like this? Compiles, but not tested yet ...
diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/fs/proc/array.c
proc/fs/proc/array.c
--- virgin/fs/proc/array.c Sat Feb 15 16:11:45 2003
+++ proc/fs/proc/array.c Sat Feb 15 18:05:10 2003
@@ -243,8 +243,10 @@ extern char *task_mem(struct mm_struct *
int proc_pid_status(struct task_struct *task, char * buffer)
{
char * orig = buffer;
- struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ task_lock(task);
+ mm = __get_task_mm(task);
buffer = task_name(task, buffer);
buffer = task_state(task, buffer);
@@ -257,6 +259,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct task_struct *
#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_S390)
buffer = task_show_regs(task, buffer);
#endif
+ task_unlock(task);
return buffer - orig;
}
diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude virgin/include/linux/sched.h
proc/include/linux/sched.h
--- virgin/include/linux/sched.h Sat Feb 15 16:11:47 2003
+++ proc/include/linux/sched.h Sat Feb 15 18:04:42 2003
@@ -706,6 +706,18 @@ static inline struct mm_struct * get_tas
return mm;
}
+
+/* lockless version of get_task_mm */
+static inline struct mm_struct * __get_task_mm(struct task_struct * task)
+{
+ struct mm_struct * mm;
+
+ mm = task->mm;
+ if (mm)
+ atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
+
+ return mm;
+}
/* set thread flags in other task's structures
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-16 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030215172407.1fdd41fd.akpm@digeo.com>
2003-02-16 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 2:09 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-02-16 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 4:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 13:05 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-16 16:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 19:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 21:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 21:21 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 23:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 19:18 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 19:19 ` more signal locking bugs? Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 19:37 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 20:07 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 20:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-17 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-17 2:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-17 2:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-17 3:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-17 5:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-17 6:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-17 17:09 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2003-02-17 3:54 ` [PATCH] fix secondary oops in sighand locking Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-17 6:36 ` more signal locking bugs? Manfred Spraul
2003-02-17 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 18:07 ` Fw: 2.5.61 oops running SDET Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 18:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 18:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-16 2:48 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-02-16 17:41 Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-16 18:45 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-02-16 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='67320000.1045361394@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®