From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:25:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:25:48 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:10434 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:25:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:28:43 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Zach Brown , Ingo Molnar cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.39 list_head debugging Message-ID: <673209954.1033284520@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20020929102731.A13755@bitchcake.off.net> References: <20020929102731.A13755@bitchcake.off.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> and we could as well add these unconditionally (no .config complexity >> needed), until 2.6.0 or so, hm? > > I'd love that. It was just a bit of sugar to help the medicine go down. Could you leave the config option in, and just default it to on? Some of us are foolish enough to be doing benchmarking on 2.5 - we need to do the performance tweaking ;-) M.