From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB03DC49EA3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24A861C67 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232757AbhF1QGF (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:06:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232433AbhF1QGA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:06:00 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A750AC061574 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=d0oLH0yMmNocoX6aVWixqwCRit5ll2P90SYDRMW8gZA=; b=qaNuiySb9526gAc1xGBm1CJzzk R3Mwk+kGTZ34YiZSeHkbavkdbDaWIR0eAZIa1A0Aa2NkW2HIj9/2+5bwJxrp6x2tLvS41YkmhbYc+ kEK9RblyHBBxWInzAU/qUKJ5zKw/68uFPw4HHi3OqsBvo1v24eWo8+dDw4DRn66WGNUWgc2DTaWmq Bx3wTWtL4CSVJswbbKjTEw+pBfg9E5I9lSE+9uKPXFIb2twaIFdhw0KTgzr8zuPJ+Ng/p4Sli8CEy z6vtoa1kbPjgEcrZCQ9Ws17wP/0/z2MZplf7TiTMEDjYbM6qC7hRVTR6SkemC4GaD69IFmgt5vX5u lhef6ddw==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::aefb] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lxtjK-008XUh-Eq; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:03:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers depend on HAS_DMA To: Mark Brown Cc: LKML , Codrin Ciubotariu , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Bo Shen , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , Alexandre Belloni References: <20210530204851.3372-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <9ba0da3b-dbdb-c91d-2def-f3dcd30cbde3@infradead.org> <20210628130214.GB4492@sirena.org.uk> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <6734cd67-ae14-74f4-a78e-b6a810c1cdec@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:03:25 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210628130214.GB4492@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/28/21 6:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 03:28:59PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> [adding LKML] >> >> ping? > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. a. The entire email/patch was there. Should I put the ping _after_ the patch? Would that help? b. What do you consider a reasonable time? The patch was sent 28 days prior to this gentle ping. > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. > Yes, I shall resend the patch. Thanks. -- ~Randy