mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com,
	Lukasz.Luba@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
	Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Enable EAS for CPPC/ACPI based systems
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:10:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6765104a-761c-4586-502c-2b98ee6016a1@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426063739.6ljxtr6hpz7tber5@vireshk-i7>

Hello Viresh,
The 2 patches are relying on Lukasz' patch-set at:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/3/21/282
The serie was accepted by Rafael (cf. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/4/13/701) and
is currently in linux-next. More specifically, the missing patch causing the
build failure is: 'PM: EM: Add .get_cost() callback'

 From what I see, the branch cpufreq/arm/linux-next (from your repo) that was
used in the CI is based on v5.18-rc1 and doesn't have Lukasz' patches. Should
we wait for the patches to be in a rc version, or is there a process for this
kind of case ?

Regards,
Pierre



On 4/26/22 08:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-04-22, 08:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 25-04-22, 14:38, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>>> v3:
>>> - Remove efficiency_class_populated variable. [Viresh]
>>> - Remove patch "cpufreq: CPPC: Add cppc_cpufreq_search_cpu_data"
>>>    and access cpu_data through policy->driver_data. [Viresh]
>>> - arm64 code only acked by Catalin [Catalin]
>>
>> Applied. Thanks.
> 
> Removed, build failures:
> 
> https://gitlab.com/vireshk/pmko/-/jobs/2375905218
> 
> Log: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/28Jos1GBXfT5Cl3HoBKKwmM8Ddk/build.log
> 
> /builds/linux/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c: In function 'cppc_cpufreq_register_em':
> 368/builds/linux/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:593:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'EM_ADV_DATA_CB'; did you mean 'EM_DATA_CB'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 369  593 |   EM_ADV_DATA_CB(cppc_get_cpu_power, cppc_get_cpu_cost);
> 370      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 371      |   EM_DATA_CB
> 372/builds/linux/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:593:3: error: invalid initializer
> 373cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 374
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-25 12:38 Pierre Gondois
2022-04-25 12:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Add per_cpu efficiency_class Pierre Gondois
2022-04-25 12:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information Pierre Gondois
2022-05-30  6:42   ` Shaokun Zhang
2022-04-26  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Enable EAS for CPPC/ACPI based systems Viresh Kumar
2022-04-26  6:37   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-26  7:10     ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2022-04-26  7:12       ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-06 19:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6765104a-761c-4586-502c-2b98ee6016a1@arm.com \
    --to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=Lukasz.Luba@arm.com \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®