From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759973AbdEYK6I (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 06:58:08 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:64010 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759617AbdEYK6E (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 06:58:04 -0400 Subject: Re: MIPS: Alchemy: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in alchemy_pci_probe() To: Manuel Lauss , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Paul Burton , =?UTF-8?Q?Ralf_B=c3=a4chle?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <6ebb5193-239f-5c34-c5f6-2be8a2fa79a5@users.sourceforge.net> <796029e7-60a3-a94b-8b5c-4686a0656560@users.sourceforge.net> <70394897-a67a-2b49-2d46-a20fb2de51f2@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <6769aa4c-3a32-3ce5-fb65-f218016a1aa8@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 12:57:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xYfpL8Uu51CtUX2uN1wJVv5j2EMvw0uxj1uHE14zusDfggW4v7x az2bmh6/gEbrbK3DwLMZd4P95TqJ+xZRvINpeFWiQiPT7XWxO7/XCktcBfm9Yc2YLBuDXHr Mf8pX6CX8hG1l1Z9E/SBM29Oxsr4PBoKssx2JUQRtvT1USgRn2/JP5rHVUaBYeT2bAw3k2m CwAZafV91c56Dg+6qiGTg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TtgMRqfCLNg=:7p3cgp2RXhLeMqbLZ7CBV+ NB9fY+p8hJrfeCo3RF9jwsSfUpuVAF+8/fM8ifeZOuLLr+JI2gw2f32suFI5tGLB2kHoMCka1 E3ApV7BqUB6Q/+XEtfr76t5IQ7rHTN3WF0R3wxoGHDziRrddIm2/dszQgL2oo5Tv8YANO2U4G dGPHYAqmzTop3TMSG8HXxikuMkt7lTa9SxCaHMCaoRhx5eWW1vChtiss6PKWFhaVqFyNSVqga tvgICZpf8p5Dc529Ng/9yUzWGmdgv6LG6YmOe225l9j434tV9EE0CH22OdeFw0fMUgmV7Rcib F9YeOO54a34CSsk6bhWmklEjUX+unhd4AEErkJ5fW7N21cjsGL8ch4PcI9yPItj4bQhNWUHjP rD0G0agCAdtyH37qNCMxnYxxcvaFVqvBxUoTL82a0ImQv7B9fdJUIkgxhheMsvR1jfqAqlJ5h 84O0Tnx29LPky1PEb0XrN7PcKzt0BxsrW0sBTZPxhmM6iBIVZ1NweHXACinBJqu6pdSjpiZu+ MB9GoZIGuNPLYI8ac9LZxulfNaApZem1QDF9hc0B+ETwecWyfbtt+JyqFAJLHPhD0D0I7ukhq 7uq1g51CsYEFUTv+Y2BNviuoLyks5EYz3o1ApYHLhsJgGDwOR2ugbXWAfrx1HNaaTq56Aidb0 uTDEBEp9ycTFj6L3dWkhfqUGlXBSIX4yMa+DlE0JmHlODfTizRcSNBRwlhkkF8/OgKqtOCvC9 pz6noe94P+RRhhqOcx2SqIYyzYWMaDOF0WKdqPmQQp8qsLhXNY7AxNQUw5xW+RbsjQicRK1kP keQEI6F Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> * Why do you seem to insist on another message if information from a Linux >> allocation failure report would be sufficient already also for this >> software module? >> >> * Do you want that it can become easier to map a position in a backtrace >> to a place in your source code? > > Does kmalloc() nowadays print a message which invocation (source line) failed? > If so I won't be standing in your way, but if not, you need to come up with > something for convincing than answering questions with more questions. I suggest also to improve the corresponding documentation for the affected programming interfaces in significant ways. How are the chances for the desired clarification of relevant implementation details? Regards, Markus